1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Softa [21]
3 years ago
11

since the 1950's, air pollution and robberies have increased. the conclusion that air pollution causes robberies is

Mathematics
2 answers:
dlinn [17]3 years ago
8 0
Had to look for the options and here is my answer.
Starting from the 1950s, both robberies and air pollution has increased and the conclusion that we can say regarding this increase is NOT JUSTIFIABLE. It is not justifiable because population is a different variable and they are not directly related to each other. Hope this helps.
Aleks [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A) not justifiable, because population is another variable.

Step-by-step explanation:

Air pollution cannot cause robberies. An increase in population is more likely to have caused the increase in air pollution and robberies.

This is just here to shorten up the other person (5 star pls)

You might be interested in
A researcher would like to determine whether a new tax on cigarettes has had any effect on people’s behavior. During the year be
sammy [17]

Answer:

a) p_v =2*P(z  

If we compare the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the population mean is NOT significant different from 410 at 5% of significance.  

b) p_v =2*P(z  

If we compare the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the population mean is significant different from 410 at 5% of significance.

c) The expplanation why we have different outcomes is because for part a we use a higher standard error compared to part b. So we have enough evidence on part b to reject the null hypothesis that we no have significant difference from 410.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Part a

Previous concepts  and data given

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

\bar X=386 represent the sample mean  

\sigma=60 represent the population standard deviation

n=9 represent the sample selected

\alpha=0.05 significance level  

State the null and alternative hypotheses.  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if we have significant difference on the mean, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:\mu = 410  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu \neq 410  

If we analyze the size for the sample is < 30 but we know the population deviation so is better apply a z test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}  (1)  

z-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".  

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:  

z=\frac{386-410}{\frac{60}{\sqrt{9}}}=-1.2    

P-value

Since is a two side test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z  

Conclusion  

If we compare the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the population mean is NOT significant different from 410 at 5% of significance.  

2) Part b

State the null and alternative hypotheses.  

The system of hypothesis not changes:

Null hypothesis:\mu = 410  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu \neq 410  

Same statistic:  

z=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}  (1)  

Calculate the statistic

But now the population deviation changes \sigma=30. We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:  

z=\frac{386-410}{\frac{30}{\sqrt{9}}}=-2.4    

P-value

Since is a two side test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z  

Conclusion  

If we compare the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the population mean is significant different from 410 at 5% of significance.

7 0
3 years ago
NO LINKS
torisob [31]

Answer:

(40*4)-(32*4)=32

160-128=32

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Simplify 4 whole 2/7 + 5/7
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

2/7+5/7=7/7=1 because 7/7 would be a 1 whole

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does anyone know how to do this?
docker41 [41]

Answer:

bone or necklace

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Solve the equation for x 1/3x - 15 = 12
Akimi4 [234]
X = 81
You are welcome
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the past year Jenny watched 44 movies that she thought were very good. She watched 55 movies over the whole year. Of the movi
    5·1 answer
  • The product of 2 and the sum of a number and 8 is equivalent to 16.
    14·2 answers
  • Simplify each expression.
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLEASE
    14·1 answer
  • The function f(x) = (x - 4)(x - 2) is shown.
    9·1 answer
  • Please help I really need it all you have to do is find the missing angle
    15·2 answers
  • Solve the following:<br><br>a) 3x+4/2 = 9.5<br><br><br>b) 7+2x/3= 5​
    14·1 answer
  • Write down the percentage multiplier used to decrease an amount by 45%
    8·1 answer
  • If f(x) = x1/2 and g(x)= 2x^3 - x1/2 - x, find f(x)-g(x)
    14·1 answer
  • 5 2/3 + 7 5/9 ples I nnmed help
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!