Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": family branding.
Explanation:
Family branding is a strategy entrepreneurs follow by naming the same or partly equal different businesses with diverse markets to take advantage of the reputation one of those businesses have obtained. The naming is legal and in most cases represents a partnership between those businesses or a license given by the main company to allow others to use part of the same name in exchange for a fee.
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question, but anyway, hope this answer helps. Over the last 50 years, family income has become MORE IMPORTANT THAN RACE <span>in explaining the educational achievement gap. Hope this answers your question.</span>
It means to say that the demand of the product is decreasing. The relationship between the price and demand is one way. It means to say that if the price increases, the demand is higher. In this scenario, the price increases to avoid shortage on the product. If the price is decreasing, it means to say that the demand is decreasing and can possibly cause surplus on the said product. Lowering the price allows consumers to have higher purchasing power and enticing them to purchase such product.
Answer:
First year depreciation expense is $2,250
Explanation:
Total depreciation expense is given by:
Price - Salvage Value = 40,000 - 4,000 = 36,000
That $36,000 depreciation expense would be spread out for 200,000 miles.
So for the first year in which the truck is used 12,500 miles, the depreciation expense will be
Question answered.
Note:
The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.
