1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
koban [17]
3 years ago
7

Which legislative tool would a senator most likely use to ensure a bill she

Social Studies
2 answers:
pochemuha3 years ago
7 0

The answer is participating in a conference committee, so C

Leto [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

its C. Participating in a conference committee.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the conflict theorists explanation of social stratification?
Bumek [7]
Social conflict theorists disagree that social stratification is functional for a society. Instead, they argue that social stratification benefits some at the expense of others. Two theorists, Karl Marx and Max Weber, are the primary contributors to this perspective. Hope it helped. Peace ✌️
4 0
3 years ago
What was an important effect of Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England?
Mnenie [13.5K]
The answer is in the picture below

5 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Who was responsible for the Boston massacre according to the British?
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

John Adams

Explanation:

Although he was one of the Patriot leaders in Boston, the 35-year-old Adams believed that it was vital that the British soldiers and their captain receive fair trials.

please mark as brainliest if I helped you

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Development of society means the transformation of society​
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

The answer is true

Explanation:

<u><em>Development of the society means transformation of society.</em></u>

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pasteur also creates vaccines against ____ and ____<br><br> SOMEONE PLEASE ANSWER ASAP
    6·2 answers
  • Which one is it ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • A sudden realization of the solution to a problem is called
    14·1 answer
  • You are studying in your dorm room, but your neighbor is blasting the television in the adjacent room. When you gently request t
    8·1 answer
  • As a result of industrialization, many people moved from
    13·1 answer
  • Dennis is a young adolescent working 15 hours a week at the Burger Barn. Similar to adolescents in a study investigating rates o
    6·1 answer
  • The Stanley company wants Home Depot to carry all its tools but not the tools of its competitors so that Stanley can maximize it
    11·1 answer
  • D. Increase the number of U.S. Senators
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Who create the Blue Heron Decoy artifact? 2. What kind of artifact is this? 3. When was it created?
    7·1 answer
  • Ranges are 6-mile increments measured (and described) from the north-south meridian running:_____.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!