Impact. John Cabot had both a positive and a negative impact on both European and indigenous societies. ... But as for Cabot, he had not found any materials that could be of use but he did find land. This was not very pleasing to the King of England but he still allowed for more expedition
Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist who was working on structural functionalism. His focus were different social institutions and the roles they play in the society. According Durkeim the society was an organism in which each portion plays a vital role in keeping the organism stable and healthy.
Durkheim defined collective conscience as the communal beliefs, morals, and attitudes of a society.
Answer:Universal suffrage (also called universal franchise, general suffrage, and common suffrage of the common man) gives the right to vote to all adult citizens, regardless of wealth, income, gender, social status, race, ethnicity, political stance, or any other restriction, subject only to relatively minor exceptions.[1][2] In its original 19th-century usage by reformers in Britain, universal suffrage was understood to mean only universal manhood suffrage; the vote was extended to women later, during the women's suffrage movement.[3][4]
There are variations among countries in terms of specifics of the right to vote; the minimum age is usually between 18 and 25 years (see age of majority) and "the insane, certain classes of convicted criminals, and those punished for certain electoral offenses" sometimes lack the right to vote.[2]
In the first modern democracies, governments restricted the vote to those with property and wealth, which almost always meant a minority of the male population.[5] In some jurisdictions, other restrictions existed, such as requiring voters to practice a given religion.[6] In all modern democracies, the number of people who could vote has increased progressively with time.[7][8] The 19th century saw many movements advocating "universal [male] suffrage", most notably in Europe, Great Britain and North America.[9][7]
Explanation:
Stanley Milgram showed that individuals will cause other individuals harm if ordered by others and if they don't have a direct contact with those other people, but are separated by technology.
In his experiment, people thought they are applying electric shocks to other participant under the orders of the experimenters and most of the participants did not refuse to administer those shocks.
Am not sure but i would say that it would be no
