1. The idea behind the concept of multiple intelligences is that human intelligence can take different "modalities," as opposed to being dominated by a single general ability. I think this is a valid construct, as it approaches the concept of "intelligence" from various different angles, not always considered when discussing intelligence in other contexts.
2. As we do not have access to this text, we are not able to answer this section of the question.
3. One way in which the developers of a test of multiple intelligences could demonstrate the validity of the test using evidence would be by also researching the behaviour of the people who took the test out in the real world. They could compare these results to the results of the test. In this way, they would be more likely to find out whether the intelligences mentioned in the test are indeed exercised in real life.
4. A passage from the Bible that could support this idea would be the following:
<em>1 Corinthians 12:12-14 – "Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptised by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Even so the body is not made up of one part but of many."</em>
In this passage, the idea of many parts within a single body is presented. However, it is also stated that the many parts of the body in fact end up forming a single entity. This is similar to the multiple intelligences that combine to give a single personality capable of certain things.
Answer:
urban is the one with all most, then suburban with the middle, and urban on the right eith thr least amouny
Explanation:
urban is city, suburban is neighborhood, and rural is farmland.
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
I think that the best answer is that it was during The New Kingdom. The New Kingdom was the time between 16 century BC and 11 century BC. It was a time of great richness and power of Egypt and it included such famous pharaohs as Tutankhamun and Hatshepsut.
Answer:
2.They rode in wagons to the West
and
4.They rode by train to the West.
Explanation:
<u>The way of transportation depends on the time of moving - before 1859. railroads weren't in the construction, and only around the 1870s, the railroad went all the way from East to West.</u>
<u>Before the 1850s, most of the miners and pioneers, especially t the beginning of the wave of moving, used wagons. </u>They carried all the supplies and things in the huge wagons pulled by oxen. Because the wagons were heavy and oxen slow, the moving was slow.
This all changed with the construction of the railroad that helped a lot. In 1895. there were already 5 major railroads operating in Iowa, <u>so if people were living near the train or were moving around this time, they were more likely to use the train to ride to the West.</u>
