<span>They're asking whether it's justified for a citizen to try to start an armed rebellion to attempt to stop something that is a great injustice. John Brown was a deeply religious person who believed that holding people as slaves was wrong. With his sons, he fought against slavery in Kansas, and then tried to rouse a black insurrection at Harpers Ferry. YOU decide: does systematic economic and social injustice justify violence? If you say no, then you'd logically think his punishment was justified. If you say yes, it sounds as though you're justifying domestic terrorism. John Brown was no Martin Luther King making non violent demonstration, that's for sure.</span>
Islam spread through military conquest, trade, pilgrimage, and missionaries.
Arab Muslim forces conquered vast territories and built imperial structures over time.
There were several reasons.
1. If the Europeans brought them to America, they would be familiar with the land, so they would be less likely to escape.
2. The Europeans believe that they were resistant to certain diseases (they weren't)
3. The Europeans know that they couldn't speak English, so they wouldn't be able to communicate
~theLocoCoco
Answer:
Scientists believed that all ocean basins and landmasses were permanently fixed in their positions
Explanation:
“A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”
According to this statement the people of the United States are free and they should not be ruled by a tyrant. The Founders believed the people of the colonies were free to determine their political destiny