uh that's a hard one, but i say B because of the in)most yknow?
if you have another attempt, pick D or A i don't know that's so hard bro
Answer:
E. A and C are correct.
Explanation:
The Romantic movement was a literary movement that focuses on the relationship of man and nature, the importance of imagination, and naturalistic and realistic elements of human nature. It also believed in the detrimental nature of science and how it acts against the very nature of imagination.
Mary Shelley's gothic novel "Frankenstein" revolves around science and how its use affects everyone. The creature became a monster that will be the downfall of not only his creator but everyone associated with him. In his need to try to be human, he was pushed to become the monster that everyone loathed. So, Mary Shelley, through her book, believed that science is purely evil and how imagination is necessary.
Thus, the correct answer is option E.
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
Answer:
B.) It contains two or more simple sentences.
D.) It includes conjunctions such as <em>for, and, nor, but, or, yet, </em>and <em>so.</em>
Explanation:
A compound sentence contains at least <em>two independent clauses</em> separated by a comma and linked by a coordinating conjunction.
An <em>independent clause</em> is a clause that has a subject, a verb and can stand alone as a sentence. (answer choice B)
Coordinating conjunctions are <em>for, and, nor, but, or, yet, </em>and <em>so. </em>(answer choice D)
