Answer:
It's basically a retirement savings plan sponsored by an employer
Explanation:
It's actually a 401k
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
it isn't in the north or middle then west or east is a judgement call.
So they may have more respect in their ruling, and so they shall gain more power. :-)
Answer:
[The] Ring of fire is active all the time, so sometimes there are many eruptions. Sometimes there are no eruptions at all. ... Aoki also clarified that recent volcanic activity, such as the rumbling of Mt. Mayon in Albay, and earthquakes around the Pacific Ring of Fire are not related
Explanation:
do not read
