The answer cannot be a because appointing all federal judges would lead to a very "one-sided" jurisdiction and promotes bias. It cannot be b either because the supreme court on average only accepts 80 cases a year though it receives thousands of requests. C is also incorrect because the supreme court does not practice "judicial restraint" it is actually known as "judicial review". The difference? The supreme court can only uphold and postpone a victim or<span> </span>defendants ruling until the court has come to the final decision. Therefor judicial restraint only represents a miniscule version of judicial review. So the answer is inevitably d.It determines whether any actions by the executive and legislative branches are unconstitutional. Hope this helps :)
The answer is boot camp. Boot camps are programs that combines get-tough elements in all branches, such as physically, mentally and emotionally together with education, substance abuse treatments, and social skills training. Boot camps last for almost an hour. Boot camps are commonly hosted by a group of personal trainers or even former military personnel.
skills training , Soft Skills Training, Professional. Training and Legal Training.
Answer:
They were settled by the same people.
Explanation:
Both Jamestown (1607) and Plymouth (1620) were similar because they were settled by the same people i. e. English men. Jamestown is the first place where first settlement of 104 English men happen and in Plymouth, English puritans settle there in 1620 for having a peaceful life. Both places has good geography and has great economies due to growing of cash crops on their fertile land.
It is a good question, because inquiring about what the government policies should be, or do, directly relates to what being a citizen is supposed to be.
A government is an entity established by the same individuals making part of it, to ease decision making; and it represents the leading part of a community (and of course a state or a nation).
As far as whether providing sponsored programs (like insurance, so to speak) to the individuals within such community or not; it's absolutely up to the will of the very members of such alluded community or nation.
When it comes to democratic governments, so to speak, it entirely depends on the agreement between the people of each nation (it's members) upon establishing what is more convenient regarding the well being of the very individuals making part of it.
Thus, if the will of the people ("<em>the will of the government</em>") matches the well being of the members of a democratic nation, makes total sense applying policies like insurance programs and any other sponsored programs that help in contingency times, or when the unexpected happens to the very members of the nation.