Answer:
True.
Explanation:
It is true that by not going to the party, Brenda is making her learning more effective.
<u>The problem that most students face after making study plans is that they are not able to stick to those study plans and get easily distracted with other chores such as partying and fun</u>.
<u>In the given case, Brenda knows that she is left with only 10 days to prepare for her exams and prepare her research works also. If Brenda would have agreed to go to party on Tuesday and Wednesday, then she would not have been able to complete her study plan. May e she even have to make a new study plan that would require more of her time so that she could cover up her two wasted days. But, </u><u>Brenda decided not to go to the party and rather stick with her study plans so that she can make her learning more effective</u>.
So, the answer is true.
Answer:
I believe its A, since the US Supreme Court is the highest court in the country.
Explanation:
<h2>Answer:</h2>
Option A is correct.
A. Congress used legislation to take back power that previous Presidents had assumed.
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
Congress used legislation to take back power that previous presidents had assured this is the example of check and balance that the war power resolution has.
the mortal theorists that would consider dog to be a person is a utilitarian
Answer:
It is not a specific party that might spend more, but more of which person is running.
<u>For example: </u>If there was a candidate that was extremely wealthy and was running as a democrate, then they would invest more money in there campaign then the other party if the other party isn't as wealthy.
<u>In other words:</u> There is not one specific party that spends more money.
