Answer:
"the pessimists underestimate our decision-making accuracy because of factors such as choosing questions that contradict people's schemas"
Explanation:
Thaler is together with Daniel Khaneman one of the parents of behavioral economics. This branch focuses on explaining and even looking for meaning in our economic behavior. In other words, why we make the decisions we make regarding our money.
In many social sciences, two different points of view about our rationality coexist today: the pessimist, who sees our limitations as systematic errors at the root of our possible irrational behavior; and the optimist, who conceives these limits as ecological advantages. The first point of view, the pessimist, is maintained by Tversky and Kahneman in their research program on heuristics and biases, and is also based on the theory of "little shoves" or nudges, which Thaler and Sunstein propose following that approach of Tversky and Kahneman.
The second, the optimist, has been developed by Gerd Gigerenzer and the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, and by other evolutionary psychologists such as Leda Cosmides and John Tooby.
The correct answer should be the trait theory
The great man theory is based on the opinion that there were throughout history great men with traits that enabled them to affect the course of history. These traits are responsible for it and without it they wouldn't affect it.
Descriptive investigations involve collecting data about a system, but not making tests or experiments.
Making tests belongs to experimental investigations.
Descriptive investigations aim to draw conclusions from observations of the fenomena, while experimental investigations design tests that let the researcher to compare results on different conditions with a control situation.
There is also the so called comparative investigations which collect data from under different conditions but do not include the control situtation.
WORK
CITY PLANNING
<span>In the 19th century, the population continued to grow unabated, doubling between 1801 and the 1820's and then doubling again between then and 1851, to 400,000 souls. This was phenomenal growth transforming Manchester into Britain’s second city. Manchester continued to grow steadily down to the end of the century. </span>
WORK- <span>Young men and women poured in from the countryside, eager to find work in the new factories and mills. The mills paid relatively high wages and they also employed large numbers of children. As a consequence, families migrating to the city often saw a considerable rise in their incomes. But not all aspects of life in the factories were pleasant. The rise in child labour was of course undesirable from the perspective of child welfare.
CITY PLANNING- </span>Better wages were undoubtedly the greatest attraction of city life, but the higher incomes came at a price. City planning was in its infancy and much of the new workers’ housing was erected with little regard to quality.
In a nutshell, the impact of the Right to Information Act of 2005, was very intense in the advertising sector, but very beneficial for the population that is submitted to it. This is because, the Right to Information Act allows situations where the advertising sector must be more transparent about the subjects it addresses. This is because the Right to Information Act allows any citizen to ask questions about certain advertising and certain relevant issues, which may or may not be controversial. In addition, this law guarantees that the citizen will be answered in a short period of time.
This is extremely important in the current environment in which we live, because it prevents confusion in the reasoning of citizens, in addition to reducing the possibility of spreading fake news, among other incorrect news.
