A i believe, i’m from oklahoma :)
The answer would be that Native American ownership of the land could not be refuted under any circumstance.
This act is placing limits on the federal government, saying that they can't just take land away from Native Americans.
That joined together to beat the other forces
You would find this information in <span>Article 3.</span>
Answer:
In this example Hector is the appellant
Explanation:
An appellant is a person who is not happy or satisfied with the decision of a lower court and hence he/she appeals to the higher court for looking into the decision taken by the lower court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court.
Since, Hector is also appealing to the higher court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court, he will be known as an appellant
