1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SCORPION-xisa [38]
2 years ago
5

Lincoln says that in 1861, "All dreaded it [civil war]--all sought to avert it" (lines 13-14). What reasons does he give in the

speech for why war came in spite of these shared feelings against war?
History
2 answers:
marysya [2.9K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

President Abraham Lincoln´s Second Inaugural Address, which took place on March 4th, 1865, addresses the issue of the civil war, and the situation of the country, as he takes office. During the speech, and especially on the second and third paragraphs, between lines 16 to the 28th, President Lincoln gives the people the reasons as to why the war was inevitable, even if it was a hateful ending for a conflict of a long while.

The first reason he gives as to why the war could not have been stopped is that both the North and South were unmoving as to how to solve the differences they had on the issue of slavery. While the North would go to war to defend the Union, and not give in to the South´s demands, the South prefered a dissolution of the Union; something the North was unwilling to do.

The second reason he gives to the issue is that the South, also becomes later on willing to engage in war, if that is what it takes for them to defend the institution of slavery. Even if the only intent of the government was to limit the spreading of slavery to the newer territories, this was not well taken by Southerners, who, through agents in the city who sought to destroy the peace, fought against all the intents of the government.

But the final, and most important issue that becomes a factor for the inevitability of the war, is the institution of slavery itself. While Northerners believe it needs to be abolished completely, and the slaves freed, the Southerners wish to retain it and will do everything, even going to war, to protect it.

natali 33 [55]2 years ago
5 0
Lincoln reasoned out that there were insurgent agents who were intent on destroying the Union without war but there were parties who would rather wage war and have an easy triumph.

Here is his reason:

"While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving<span> the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to </span>destroy<span> it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would </span>make<span> war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would </span>accept<span> war rather than let it perish, and the war came." - President Abraham Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address March 4, 1865.</span> 
You might be interested in
Select all that apply.
QveST [7]

Answer:

I got the answers Select all that apply.

Mauryans

Kshatriyas

Brahmans

Kushans

Untouchables

Explanation:

I hope this helps you guys and girls

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Regarding the Atlantic charter, how was the Soviet Union different than the United States and Great Britain? The United States a
erica [24]

The USA and GB did not seek to obtain new lands

8 0
3 years ago
James Oglethorpe, the founder of Georgia, established good relations with local American Indians by
marissa [1.9K]
After some research I found that your question is multiple choice. The answer choices are:
<span>A. releasing them from enslavement and forced labor.
B. providing them with rum and tobacco for a low price.
C. allowing them representation in the colonial government.
D. making American Indian trade an important part of Georgia’s economy.

The correct answer is D</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This is for history, the question says: In Article XLII, a slave master may chain and beat his slaves, but he cannot torture or
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

A beating is far less severe than torture and mutilation.

Explanation:

Torture is far more extensive and does more damage as well as increases the chance greatly of psychological damage. Mutilation is also way too harsh due to the same facts.

3 0
2 years ago
The Aztec forced the people of conquered lands into
galben [10]
The Aztec forced the people of conquered lands into slavery. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The ruler on which Muslim empire created an enormous legal code for his empire?
    9·1 answer
  • Who began plotting a coup to overthrow Ngo Dinh Diem?
    9·2 answers
  • Introduction: Match each action with the group most likely to use it.
    5·2 answers
  • 9. Which of the following is an accurate statement about the Justinian Code? (5 points)
    15·2 answers
  • Lost Generation writers, such as Ernest Hemingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald, were influenced by
    12·1 answer
  • True or false In 1892, The San Francisco school board banned Chinese,Korean,and Japanese children from going to school with whit
    5·1 answer
  • What are the major principles of the constitution
    11·1 answer
  • Which policy establishes the right of the United States to act as a policeman in the Western Hemisphere? A. the Roosevelt Coroll
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Texas government collapse at the end of the Civil War?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the fast-paced production of plays in the Globe Theater
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!