Answer:
The claim made by the researcher lacks the validity on basis of reasons as indicated in the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim made by the researcher is not valid on basis of following reasons:
- Interacting variables are not mapped accurately. The additional variables as the health status of the volunteers, eating and fitness habits are not considered in the consideration. This results in a in complete validation.
- The placebo effect is not catered accordingly. As the half of the volunteers are taking nothing, this is not the direct influence of the placebo and thus double-blinded testing for placebo effect is to be ensured in future experiments.
- The environmental effects are not considered as the effect under study is dependent on the environmental effects, thus the claim is biased and the generalization is not valid.
Answer:
i think it is the 3rd one
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
please mark me brainliest
Answer:
x=1 is the solution of the equation 2x+4=10−4x
Step-by-step explanation:
The graphs of f(x)=2x+4 and g(x)=10−4x intersect at (1, 6)
2x +4 = 10 - 4x
We need to solve for x by combining like terms
Add 4x on both sides
6x + 4= 10
Now subtract 4 on both sides
6x = 6
divide both sides by 6
x= 1
x=1 is the solution of the equation 2x+4=10−4x
The average wait time is simply the averages of all the wait times in a product category. For instance, a custom watch manufacturer might have a wait time that ranges from 5 days to 10 days for a model A watch depending on the options. The average wait time for the model A watch is 7.5 days.
