Answer:
The most suitable answer here is D. Concurrent Control.
Explanation:
Concurrent control is also known as preventive controls and steering controls where the aim of the control procedure is to identify the possible flaws of a process and to prevent them before occurring.
Furthermore, in this scenario as you can see, Donald consults production manager and formulates measures as the process is ongoing. This makes it more of a "concurrent control" as well.
So Why did we not use any of the other options?
Option A, reactive controls is incorrect in this case, because reactive measures are completely spontaneous actions that respond to an accident.
Option B is incorrect too, because feedback controls are done after a process has been completed and through identification of falls happened.
Option C, feed forward controls are not correct in this scenario as well. Although it is a type of preventive control, in this scenario it is not entirely preventive. They are formulating measures even as the process is ongoing.
Answer: $450,000
Explanation:
It is shown that Nana Company does not have significant influence over Mama Company.
What this means is that Mama's retained earnings, incomes or dividends have no effect on the investment account of Nana in relation to their Mama investment.
The only relevant amount is the fair value of the Mama's stock that Nana owns.
= 10,000 * 45
= $450,000
I don't know what you're asking is this a question
Answer: $500
Explanation:
Had to complete the question first
No of security guard No of radio stolen/wk
0 50
200 30
400 20
600 14
800 8
1000 6
Explanation:
If the firm decides to hire the first security guard and a radio worth $25, MB = MC which gives us the sum of $500 which is the worth of hiring the first security guard. Hiring the guard is same as having no quarrel at all and paying for the stolen radios. This means the security guard would save 20 radios at $25 each.
