1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
postnew [5]
3 years ago
15

I HAVE PUT THIA QUESTION 6 TIMES 6 TIMES OKAY AND NOBODY ANSWERD MY QUESTION PLEASE CAN SOOME INTELLGENT HELP ME AT LEAST ONE TI

ME IN MY LIFE !!!!
If your freedom was in jeopardy, what would you be willing to sacrifice? Be honest. The truth is that sometimes it is better to play it safe. Sometimes it is better to risk. How do you know which choice to make?
History
2 answers:
pochemuha3 years ago
4 0
I would give up my clothes my shelter anything to be free at that time  and you have to decide by your own instincts whether it is safer to be safe or risk
antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
3 0
I would be willing to sacrifice maybe my treasure. It's better to risk. No money, no freedom. If you have no freedom, what's the point of having money. You can't spend it. So pay money, your freedom is rewarded. You will know which choice to choose by weighing the pros and cons. Cons are what you don't want to happen to you. Pros are what you benefit. This is how you would know which choice to make.


Hope this is what you are asking and hope it helps!
You might be interested in
Why was the French Revolutions idea of everyone having rights and being equal, a dangerous idea?
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

Why the French Wanted Equality

The nobles and clergy were the privileged orders. They were exempt from such direct taxes as the taille, or land tax. Most taxes were paid by the Third Estate—a class that included peasants, artisans, merchants, and professional men. Even among these groups taxes were not equal

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was life in France like for the common people (merchants, farmers, the poor, etc.) prior to the French Revolution of 1789?
shusha [124]

<u>Life in France for the common people prior to the French Revolution of 1789:</u>

Before the revolution in France started in the year 1789, which started because the people of France were very disappointed, sad and frustrated and had a lot of debt on them so wanted their condition to get a little better.

The people who were the middle class like the poor, merchants had really bad conditions where they could barely survive with basic necessities and had to pay a lot of tax which was imposed by the officials. The government was also not working properly to improve their condition and their condition was deteriorating.

3 0
3 years ago
what was not a reason for westward expansion in the americas in the 1800's? A. high birth rates, B. decreased immigration, C. im
Stells [14]
<span>What was not a reason for westward expansion in the americas in the 1800's?
</span><span>B. decreased immigration

The Westward expansion was brought about by the increasing number of population as well as the need to acquire more land to farm and produce crops. Gold was discovered in the west during those times thus increasing the number of people migrating to the west.


</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following documents did NOT influence the U.S. Constitution?
Aneli [31]
<span>Bible documents did NOT influence the U.S. Constitution. I think that is been excluded in the US Constitution.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the sophists different from the other philosophers of ancient greece? explain ur answer
lilavasa [31]

Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.

Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.

Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal,  regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.

Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract,  out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.

In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When selecting a savings account, you should consider each of these factors, except _____.
    11·2 answers
  • A small Georgia farmer who was suffering economically during the 1890s would
    8·1 answer
  • Examine the factors that contributed to the resurgence of conservatism in American politics and government from 1964 to the end
    5·2 answers
  • What was the outcome of the treaty of guadalupe hidalgo?
    5·1 answer
  • Key clauses in the fourteen amendment match each clause to the phrase that best defines it
    11·1 answer
  • Which countries founded settlements in North America, and what were their motivations for settlement?
    15·1 answer
  • 10 Points answer ASAP
    13·2 answers
  • In the wake of the September 11th attacks
    11·1 answer
  • What happened when the Incas and the Spanish met for the first time?
    10·2 answers
  • Can you think of an example of how Spain has influenced the modern world
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!