Answer:
The answer, experts said, is not a very effective one. The US only has a limited ability to destroy an incoming nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile, a study released last month by the American Physical Society concluded.
I hope I'm correct
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Corporate Violence is is kind of white collar crime conducted by business people that even cause death of people. It even corresponds to selling of harmful product in the market or product that below standard qualities.
b. the lack of action by BP prior to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico despite knowledge of unstable seals
is an example of "corporate violence".
Answer:
Technically the answer would probably be C.4th Amendment/violated
Explanation:
However if the student is suspicious then the school has every right to check their bag because of concerns. For this specific question C is the answer but based on personal experience that really doesn't make sense to put it.
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
Answer:
the answer is b.
Explanation:
they other answers were incorrect and it makes the most sense
