Answer:
In the essay piece "Survivor's Guilt: The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt," published by author Nancy Sherman, she investigates the sentiments of guilt that servicemembers and women face after being exposed to traumatic events. They must survive an incidence in which they are deemed to be responsible for the death or injury of another person or group of people in order to be eligible for parole. Furthermore, they are haunted by feelings of guilt because of their incapacity to save them from themselves.
"Survivor guilt" is a negative emotion that emerges when a person has survived a difficult situation of any type, such as a natural disaster. In the aftermath of a sad occurrence, survivors may have overwhelming emotions of guilt that are difficult to manage. Soldiers' moral recovery is dependent on their capacity to forgive themselves and not be concerned with their own suffering, as described above.
According to the article "The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt," survivors may experience guilt even though they have done nothing wrong. This is since it happens much too often, and people who have done wrong should feel bad about themselves. When dealing with survivor guilt after a natural disaster or terrorist attack, there is a way to produce a solution that both people can agree on.
As evidence, below are a few notable points. Some examples include the following, all of which should be considered:
The fact that one has survived a natural disaster may make one feel guilty about his or her situation.
It is one way to share some of your bad luck: Sob uncontrollably in sorrow over your sins.
It is only through the mix of self-forgiveness and self-apathy that soldiers' morale may be restored.
Finding the perfect balance between a soldier's work and personal life might be difficult for him or her.
Explanation:
(305 words)
O% plagiarism in my answer. Please change words to make it your own work. :)
Answer:
look at the table of contents.
Explanation:
You can see what the book has to offer without reading it.
Answer:
They journey took me _some_ hours
The meaning of the word incredulous, based on its parts is: "full of disbelief".
The prefix in- is one of the many prefixes that mean "no". So it denies the meaning of the word following it. One example would be the word inefficient. By adding the prefix in- to the adjective efficient, we deny the adjective. If we call a person inefficient, we are saying the person is "not efficient", not able to finish tasks in a proper time and manner.
As for the other part of the word we're analyzing here, "credulous" comes from the Latin word "credere", which means "believe". A credulous person is a person who believes in things easily, without questioning or reasoning.
By putting in- and credulous together, we form "incredulous", or "not credulous". So an incredulous person is a person who does not believe easily - who is full of disbelief.
Answer:
Yes, they are wrong to do so.
Explanation:
First, it is best to establish that Wakanda is a fictional state which appeared in American comic books. Perhaps, its creator wondered what a Civilized Africa would have looked like today if it was left undisturbed by colonial influence.
That is by the way.
According to the description of Wakanda, it was rich in tech and rare minerals such as Vibranium which can absorb energy and release it kinetically. Wakanda, according to fictional sources is the most technologically advanced nation on the earth.
Long story short, Wakanda had all the tech it needed to protect itself and some.
If Wakanda was that self-sufficient and so advanced, it means that it had all the power required to act as a voice and where necessary, a protector of black people and Africa all around the world.
We see America holding a similar position, deploying military personnel where necessary. One of the reasons, why it does this is because it can.
To whom much is given, much is expected.
If there was a vacant spot for a nation that could let it's voice, it's arms, it's resources to the protection of the black race, it should have been Wakanda.
Cheers
