Answer:
The majority of the total operating budget for most organizations is represented by supply chain costs
Explanation:
An operating budget is the annual budget of an activity stated in terms of Budget Classification Code, functional/subfunctional categories and cost accounts. It contains estimates of the total value of resources required for the performance of the operation including reimbursable work or services for others. It also includes estimates of workload in terms of total work units identified by cost accounts. Supply chain costs take up the most in the total amount of the budget. Supply chains include costs related to procurement, transportation , inventory and quality.
Surrounded by water
There were so many hills/mountains around the area that made traveling hard
Isolation from other cities
The correct answer is The map shows that nuclear missiles launched from Cuba could strike almost anywhere in the United States.
Explanation: In this case the map is showing missiles from Cuba and how they were powerful, so powerful that it was possible to strike almost all the US with it.
Answer: Please see answers in explanation column
Explanation:
To be overthrown in a millitary coup or (coup d'état ) means When an existing authority or government is suddenly and violently displaced by the military who usurps power from the existing government.
Some of the famous military coup witnessed in history include
----Napoleon Bonaparte who assumed the Consul for Life of France after a coup d'état.
------ The overthrow of King Idris in Libya by Muammar al-Gaddafi
----Military coup headed by Idi Amin in Uganda. etc
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
