The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
To ask for especially as a right claimed the inheritance.
Explanation:
The driver claimed the right to a hearing.
good day, and be safe
∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵
⊕ΘΞΠΤ⊕
∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵
Could I have more information please or is that the full question
Answer:
d
Explanation: plz brainlyest i need it to rank up
Answer:
Stevenson wanted to say that this poem was extremely striking and so profound that it can reach very remote points of the human soul.
I believe that the poem is chilling as a whole and that no part stands out, because all its lines are equally striking.
Explanation:
When Stevenson states that "the furthest reaches of disdain and rage ... bereft of all 'normal human feelings," she means that what she has just read is something very strong and loaded with meaning, capable of touching the reader of grandly. That's because the poem is extremely deep and can reach very remote parts of the soul and trigger feelings so strong and obscure that the beds didn't even know they had them.
