Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
Answer:
$329,840
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the net note payable to Grant
Net note payable to Grant=$70,000 × 4.712
Net note payable to Grant= $329,840
OR
Net note payable to Grant= ($70,000 × 5.712) – $70,000
Net note payable to Grant= $329,840
Therefore On AGH's December 31, 2017 balance sheet, the net note payable to Grant is:$329,840
Answer:
Real purchasing power increase= 2.16%
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You deposit $1,900 in your savings account that pays an annual interest rate of 3.25%. The inflation rate is 1.09%.
In this example, we have two different and opposite effects. The interest rate increases your purchasing power. If the inflation rate is 0, the purchasing power will increase (in one year) 3.25%.
The inflation rate decreases the purchasing power of nominal income.
Real purchasing power increase= annual interest rate - inflation rate
Real purchasing power increase= 3.25 - 1.09= 2.16%
Answer:
A trade off or it may be D opportunity at the maegin
Answer:
changes in private savings offset any changes in the government deficit
Explanation:
Ricardian equivalence means that private saving changes offset any changes in the government budget. Therefore, if the deficit increases by 30, private saving also increases by 30 but the trade deficit and the budget deficit will not change.
In case of the Ricardian equivalence, economic agents are assumed to be perfectly rational. According to them, higher taxes are required to repay the debt in case of an increase in deficit-financed government spending.
