The correct answer should be Compare and Contrast strategy of presentation. In it, you compare numerous items and describe how they are similar and different from each other, so as to prove your point.
Answer:
In this case option B) “determines who the story’s narrator will be” is the correct one since according to the point of view of a story we can tell who the narrator is. These are some of the types of point of view:
• First person point of view: the story is told by the main character in first person
• Third person omniscient point of view: the narrator tells the story in 3rd person and provides the reader information about all characters feelings and emotions
The narrator can choose from the different points of view according to what he wants to convey.
Option 1) is not correct since all points of view help the author tell a story in the most effective way, it will vary according to the author’s needs.
Option C) is also incorrect since choosing the point of view is not related to which characters are good or bad in the story.
Option D) is also incorrect since the point of view does not foreshadow the events in a story, it just indicates who is narrating the story and what things the author wants the audience to know when describing the characters and the events.
Because he enjoyed writing about romance
Answer:
A. abstract is the answer
Answer:
Tinker v. Des Moines was a ruling of the Supreme Court of 1969, through which an interpretation of the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was made.
In the events that motivated the cause, anti-war and pacifist students from different high schools in the city of Des Moines, Iowa, began to carry black ribbons on their arms as a protest and a sign of mourning for the lives of the young Americans and Vietnamese soldiers who were dying in battle.
School district authorities punished these students with suspensions and other disciplinary sanctions, against which their families sued the district. The Court, finally, established that the fact that these children wore black bracelets was part of their right to freedom of expression, and that the Des Moines school district could not limit this right, especially when the fact that they wore said bracelets did not impede the normal development of school activities or violate the rights of other children or third parties.
