Hola, que olvidaste poner el texto necesario para responder a esta pregunta. El texto está en la imagen adjunta.
Answer:
El texto trata sobre la pareja de Smith hablando sobre la capacidad de un médico para curarse y morir junto con sus pacientes.
Explanation:
Al leer el texto, podemos ver que el Sr. y la Sra. Smith están hablando de lo que sería un buen médico. No están de acuerdo en que un buen médico sea el que pueda curarse a sí mismo pueda curar a un paciente y si el paciente muere, el médico debe morir junto con el paciente, ya que él es responsable de él, así como un capitán es responsable del barco que dirige y naufragios juntos.
Groups like the KKK and the White League were afraid of different ethnic groups like African Americans getting equal treatment from white people. Hope this helped :)
Answer:
No, I would not be able to tolerate the increases. The tax that would "push me over the edge" would be the taxes on snack foods.
<span>The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom is a statement about both freedom of conscience and the principle of separation of church and state. Written by Thomas Jefferson and passed by the Virginia General Assembly on January 16, 1786, it is the forerunner of the first amendment protections for religious freedom. Hope this helps</span>
Answer:
Short answer YES
Explanation:
Because law by its very nature concerns moral judgments, a government that stands under the rule of law presupposes the existence of a moral order, expresses the social concept of that order, and in turn encourages the fundamental moral principles of a society, particularly regarding justice. Sustaining limited government and freedom turns on the question of how virtue is cultivated and which communities and institutions are most appropriate for this task.Such a shift in the public's attitude toward expansive government can weaken democracy, given that diversification of authority among local associations is a strong check against government tyrannyAll political communities, including nation-states, are held together by civic bonds or "ties that bind." As the motto of the United States-e pluribus unum,or "out of many, one" -implies, the kinds of obligations that unite its many members into one people are of critical importance. These bonds often take the form of moral obligations that we owe one another as members of the same community.National governments do not, for example, attract citizens to the good of compassion with the same power as other social institutions because they bind citizens to a sovereign state, or to an impersonal law, rather than to other citizens directly. desires to bind its "many" into "one" to limit its power and its purse, leaving primary responsibility for moral formation in the hands of local moral communities. Only these associations and institutions can foster true justice and compassion for those in need-a fact that makes them essential for the cultivation of virtuous citizens and the prevention of governmental tyranny.
