1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuki888 [10]
3 years ago
6

If a researcher discovers she has notes that do not pertain to her thesis, she would most likely do which of these? Select all t

hat apply. Discard those notes. Save those notes for use on another topic. Redo her research. Rework her thesis. Rewrite the notes to fit the thesis.
History
1 answer:
Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
5 0
The correct answer should be Save those notes for use on another topic

You shouldn't change your entire thesis or your notes to fit it because that would be bad for the thesis and for the notes. Discarding them completely would be a waste of the notes so it's better to put them away for future use since you never know when you might need them.
You might be interested in
How do social scientist interpret the past
avanturin [10]
The main way in which social scientist interpret the past is by looking at huma interactions--how humans have evolved to deal and create things like economies and social norms.
Hope it helped : )
7 0
3 years ago
Who helped prometheus get access to heaven?
kirill [66]

Answer: Heracles

Explanation:

With the permission of Zeus, Heracles killed the eagle that ate prometheus liver and freed him

6 0
2 years ago
What is the weakest argument against using the atomic bomb? Why?
Novosadov [1.4K]

Argument 1: The Bomb Was Made For Defense Only

Argument 2: Use of the Bomb was Illegal

Argument 3: Use of the Atomic Bombs Was Racially Motivated

There Were Alternatives...  most people said that we as a nation could have used other resources to end the war against japan... it was also considered unseemly to bomb not only active militants but women and children too.

3 0
3 years ago
Which is a controversial piece of supply-side economics?
SCORPION-xisa [38]
A controversial piece of supply-side economics is the <span>increased funding for the government. Supply-side economics is an economic theory in which states that economic growth will be possible in investing capital and letting products, services, and goods enter. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
What were goals of the French Revolution? Check all that apply.
KengaRu [80]
Ending the class system 
ending absolute rule 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are castile navarre and aragon
    7·1 answer
  • How did the creation of a cult of personality around Joseph Stalin affect soviet society
    5·1 answer
  • General ________ led the United States forces during the Battle of New Orleans.
    13·2 answers
  • Which type of source is more likely to show bias
    14·2 answers
  • Are the Philippines East of Vietnam?
    12·2 answers
  • What was the new ear called in Japan and what did it mean
    15·1 answer
  • Is responsible for creation
    14·2 answers
  • What is the Soviet union ​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these was a major development in Japanese art
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these parts of the U.S. Constitution contain the responsibilities of the president of the United States?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!