Answer:
oh I didn't know there's separate ones, let me solve it since I got time.
Explanation:
You mean the charges against McCandless? Kraukauer is the author.
This chapter seems to be a digression from the McCandless story, as Krakauer pads his novel with filler material, tangential stories of others who have died in the wild: Gene Rossellini, a "wayward genius...interested in knowing if it was possible to be independent of modern technology"; John Mellon Waterman, whose "life's work", became an "accumulation of notes, poetry, and personal journals"; Everett Ruess, an artist and writer who died in the Sierras; and the Papar, Irish monks, whose "remarkable voyages were... undertaken chiefly from the...
Answer:
Athanasius thought of the gold as an opportunity to help people whereas John fled from the scene as if he was being chased by a monster thinking that taking gold out of somewhere was a sin.
Explanation:
Athanasius wanted to take the gold as he saw no sin in helping the neighbor population with it but everything John felt was fear as soon as he saw the gold.
John was a man of simple ethics and lifestyle and didn't want any complications to his life.
Athanasius was a man of his own doings and always liked to think otherwise. He believed the bag of gold was a gift from an angel.
John believed in changing things for people by on's hard work and determination.
Both the brothers varied with different perspectives on life.
Answer:
Reflective. He is reflected on his beautifully described dream.
Explanation:
