1. Since -4 doesn’t equal -2, we will use the first function. All you have to do is plug in -4 to x, and you should get
-3
2. -2=-2, so we will use the second function to get the answer of
3
3. Once again we will be using the first function, so just plug 5 into the answer to get
-7.5
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
Step-by-step explanation:
H0 : μ = 582
H1 : μ < 582
Test statistic :
T = (xbar - μ) ÷ σ/√n
Xbar = 515 ; n = 20 ; σ = 120
T = (515 - 582) ÷ 120/√20
T = -67 / 26.832815
T = 2.50
Pvalue at t score = 2.50 ; df = 19 is 0.0187
At α = 0.0187
Pvalue > α ; Hence, we fail to reject the Null
Hence, we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
Answer:
789
Step-by-step explanation:
9+10(78)
9+10*78
9+780
789
4/5 divided by 1/10 = 4/5 x 10/1 = 40/5 = 8
Answer:
Option B: 3x + 3y - 3
Step-by-step explanation:
In an isosceles triangle, the two congruent sides are equal.
We are told the base is; x - y - 2 units
Now let each of the congruent sides be represented as A.
Thus the perimeter equation will be;
P = 2A + x - y - 2
Now, we are told that the perimeter is; 7x + 5y - 8 units
Thus;
7x + 5y - 8 = 2A + x - y - 2
Rearranging gives;
7x - x + 5y + y - 8 + 2 = 2A
2A = 6x + 6y - 6
Divide through by 2 to give;
A = 3x + 3y - 3 units
