1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phantasy [73]
3 years ago
5

You are considering to buy a $250,000 property with a 80% LTV ratio and have two mortgage choices: a FRM or a FRM with an IO per

iod. The lender offers the following two loans: Loan 1: 30 year FRM, fully amortizing monthly payments; 4% interest Loan 2: 30 year FRM with 4 year IO period, fully amortizing monthly payments; 4.15% interest Check all the true statements: If I want to save on interest payments, I would choose Loan 2 If I want to minimize the payments in the first few years, I would choose Loan 2 If I'd like to pay off the loan sooner, I'd choose Loan 1 If I want my payments to remain the same for the duration of the loan, I would pick Loan 1
Business
1 answer:
scoray [572]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Statement # 1: False

Statement # 2: True

Statement # 3: False

Statement # 4: True

Explanation:

Lets look at each statement provided in the question and determine which of them is true or false.

Statement # 1 is false. First things first, the interest on this loan amount is higher which is at 4.15%. This is compared to the interest of 4% applicable on loan option 1. Secondly, there is a four year interest only option. This means that for 4 years there will be no repayments of the principal amount which means that the interest of 4.15% will continue to apply on the entire loan amount for these 4 years. In loan 1 however, principal repayments will reduce the principal amount after the 1st year which would further reduce the interest payment in the second year.

Statement # 2 is true. Loan 2 has an interest only period for the first 4 years. During this year you will only pay the 4.15% interest whereas in loan option 1, you will pay 4% interest AND the principal amount. The effect would offset once principal payments start in loan 2 but it would still mean that payments would be minimized in the first few years.

Statement # 3 is false. One of the advantages of having a loan with an interest free clause is that you can pay it off faster than a conventional loan. Since both the loans are fully amortizing, the principal payments would be different but would both result in the principal being repaid in the full 30 year tenor. Any extra payment that you wish to make would be counted towards principal payment in each loan option. However, for loan 1, the total monthly payments you make would remain the same. For loan 2, the extra payments that you make will continue to lower the monthly payments in way of interest which would allow you to save up more to pay more off in principal. The interest only period will also allow you to arrange extra funds during the IO period and repay the principal further. With loan 1, you will continue to make the same monthly payment until the end.

Statement # 4 is true. A fixed payment is being made each year by way of interest and principal repayments and will remain the same till the loan is fully amortized at maturity. In loan 2 on the other hand, a larger balloon payment will start 4 years later since only interest is paid in the first 4 years. So basically you may lower in the first 4 years and more in the remaining years.

You might be interested in
All of the following issues can be addressed by a faculty member at your high school except
Orlov [11]

The issues are as follows:

1) nutrition.

2) financial aid.

3) hearing and vision tests.

4) legal help.

The issue that cannot be addressed by the faculty members at the high school is the legal help.

Fourth option is the correct answer.

<h3>What is meant by a high school?</h3>

A high school is the place where the students are studying in the grades from 9th to 12th.

The faculty members of the high school are addressing the issues relating to financial assistance, testing of hearing and eye vision and the nutritional requirements.

Therefore, the legal help being the issue which could not be addressed by faculty members in the high school.

Learn more about the faculty members in the related link:

brainly.com/question/11920261

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Bill owns Jurisprudence Employers, Inc., a legal staffing company and employs George. One day Bill instructed George to falsify
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

Bill is also equally and somewhere more liable as he is the employer.

Explanation:

Although in records it might seem that George did the falsify act, but for that he required the permission of his employer.

When the fact is clearly stated that George did this on direction of his employer Bill, and that Bill demanded this intentionally in order to present extra profits, he is more liable for this false act.

As George is the employee, he is bound  to follow the directions of his employer. Thus Bill is crucially liable for this act, as he is an important reason for this act.

7 0
3 years ago
If a customer credit score is within 2 points of the minimum of what the business will accept, should the business extend credit
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

Explanation:

I wouldn't.

The business has drawn a rigid line in the sand. It has to maintain its standard. I might try and make a deal with the customer. "Come up with x% for a down payment."

If the score is high (like over 750), I would likely stretch my standard. 750 is a pretty high score and if you have that kind of a number, you know how to pay things back.

5 0
3 years ago
A business is sued because its neglect led to damage to a private home in a
QveST [7]

Answer:I think it is B punitive damages

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Two athletes of equal ability are competing for a prize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether to take a dangerous performance-enh
dedylja [7]

Answer:

The best option is when both athletes decide not to take drugs and each earns $5,000.

Explanation:

In a Nash equilibrium scenario:

                                                 Athlete 1's decision

                                      take drug                   do not take drug

Athlete 2's                     $5000 - x/                        $0 /

decision                                  $5,000 - x                     $10,000 - x

take drug

do not                           $10,000 - x/                        $5,000 /  

take drug                                          $0                               $5,000

The best possible situation occurs when both athletes decide not to take the drugs. In this situation both athletes win $5,000. If both athletes decide to take the drug and charge the price, they will both earn $5,000 - X.

The Nash equilibrium should show the situation where both players win the most regarding the other player's strategy.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What drivers for unethical behavior are evident in reviewing the actions of Bernard Madoff and the managers of the Stanford Fina
    7·1 answer
  • When output increases, the PPC of the economy __________ , indicating ________in the economy.
    5·2 answers
  • Discuss the link between polygamy and the dawn of agriculture
    13·1 answer
  • ​Ambrosia, a small country in the Mediterranean​ region, has an​ agriculture-based economy. In recent​ years, a decline in globa
    10·1 answer
  • The Delphi technique is a useful way to gather opinions from experts who
    13·2 answers
  • Whatever, Inc., has a bond outstanding with a coupon rate of 5.87 percent and semiannual payments. The yield to maturity is 6.9
    10·1 answer
  • A step-by-step process that involves several procedures such as defining the problem, collecting relevant information, and analy
    14·1 answer
  • 9. Problems and Applications Q9 Suppose that a borrower and a lender agree on the nominal interest rate to be paid on a loan. Th
    11·1 answer
  • Fleet, Inc. manufactured 700 units of Product A, a new product, in 20Xl. Product Xs variable and fixed manufacturing costs per u
    10·1 answer
  • In a well-constructed paragraph, evaluate the significance of government to the economic well-being of the nation or people. Inc
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!