Answer:
I would us the data by
Explanation:dividing the difference in the prices of similar homes between districts by the difference in test scores between districts
Answer:
A. $41,120.
Explanation:
Year Description Cash flow Present [email protected]%
0 Equipment cost ($30,000) ($30,000)
1-4 Additional CF $24,000 $69,929.10
4 Residual value $2,000 $1,184.16
Present value total $41,113.26
Based on the above calculation, the answer shall be A. $41,120.
Answer:
9.14%
Explanation:
Calculation for YTM
First step is to use financial calculator to find the I which represent Interest rate
FV = 1,000
PMT= 1,000*8.4%/2= 42
N= 9years*2= 18
PV= -955
Hence,
I= 4.57%
Now let calculate YTM
YTM = 4.57%*2
YTM =9.14%
Therefore YTM will be 9.14%
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In a perfectly competitive market, all producers sell identical goods or services. Additionally, there are many buyers and sellers. Because of these two characteristics, both buyers and sellers in perfectly competitive markets are price takers. Market price is set by the forces of demand and supply.
If the seller attempts to set his own price and sets it above the market price, the seller would lose all its customers and make zero sales.
If the seller attempts to set his own price and sets it below the market price, the seller would make losses .
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
a. mostly cigarette buyers.
Explanation:
The law of demand states an inverse relationship between quantity demanded of a good and it's price, keeping other factors affecting demand as constant.
Price elasticity of demand refers to the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price.
Alcohol and cigarettes are exceptions to the law of demand since in their case, the factor of addiction presides which outweighs rational decision making.
Thus, price elasticity of demand of cigarettes is inelastic. So a marginally higher price charged for cigarettes will not reduce their consumption.
A new tax on cigarettes would raise their prices. The manufacturers, to cover such taxes and maintain the same margin as before would further raise the prices of cigarettes further.
Thus, the tax burden would be shifted to the consumers and hence majorly borne by them.