The correct answer is <span>he believed it was unnecessary for a national government that possessed only specific, delegated powers.
He believed that a government that had only limited specific powers was not necessary since the government would not exploit the people even if they didn't have the bill of rights. Since a tyrannical government can change easily at the next election cycle, then there's no necessity for a bill of rights since anyone infringing upon liberties would be changed after their term or would be impeached.</span>
The world is becoming more globalized and connected.
The Great Depression that occurred after World War I had far-reaching political implications in the United States and abroad. The war had disrupted agriculture and manufacturing to an extent that countries were hard pressed to recover.
In many respects, the Depression marked a significant political change in the United States. It marked a shift to an interventionist federal government.
The ability to own property is only available to free people. For example, in the early 1800's a slave could not own property.
