<span>I'd say "I don't care" by Apocolyptica can describe parts</span>
I believe the answer is: <span>Availability heuristic
</span><span>Availability heuristic is an occurrence when people choose to rely on simplistic examples to discuss a certain topic rather than choose to analyze it with a more complex method. In news, this would make people attribute social problem to specific group of people or a specific party rather than giving it a full thought.</span>
The correct answer that describes the description above is
partisan polarization. This is defined as a case of which the person’s stance
in a particular policy or issue is considered to be a strictly defined in
regards of one’s persons identification in terms of the particular political
party that the person is in or part at.
I believe the answer is: increases resources available for their children.
This could even be seen in modern day mate selection. When you observe it, you would notice that men with 'high power/influence' tend to have the largest option in term of selection. This happen because high power/influence is usually correlated with ability to obtain large amount of resource (wealth/connections)