1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zolol [24]
2 years ago
14

In Baker v. Carr, how did the Supreme Court interpret the equal protection

Social Studies
1 answer:
Maurinko [17]2 years ago
4 0

In Baker v. Carr, how did the Supreme Court interpret equal protection as all votes should be counted equally.

The highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States is known as the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). All matters heard in U.S. federal courts as well as state court cases involving issues of federal law are subject to its exclusive appellate jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court serves as the final arbiter of law, upholding the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans. In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's protector and interpreter. According to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Supreme Court is "distinctly American in idea and function."

Learn more about Supreme Court here:

brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
The main producers in aquatic environments are _______.
Burka [1]
A handful would be: kelp, algae, mosses, and phytoplankton. There's more but they are categorized as "advanced" most likely. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
___________ pertains to the responsibilities supervisors have to oversee the actions of their supervisees.
Natali5045456 [20]
The president of the United States of America
6 0
3 years ago
One element of the u.s. constitution that is relevant to the legal basis for drug testing is __________.
kipiarov [429]
Ones freedom from unreasonable search and seizure

the 4th amendment
7 0
3 years ago
Why might a Roman historian like Ammianus want to compare the Huns to “unthinking animals”?
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

Because from roman point of view, one who is not roman were considered barbaric creatures.

Explanation:

The Huns were barbarian nature should be seen in the context that they were very fine horsemen, great fighters, and vicious in battle. They did not fight with the methods of the Roman war, and the Romans did not fight with this barbarity. If an individual was not a Roman, he or she was seen as a barbarian and therefore seen an animal that should be treated harshly.

4 0
3 years ago
Write atleast one sentence for component of civilization as it relates to Mesopotamia ​
strojnjashka [21]
Indus River because it was close to the Mesopotamia
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which painter of the northern European Renaissance was famous for his portraits that captured accurate likenesses and seemed to
    14·2 answers
  • Does a grasshoper goes through a complete metamorphosis?
    12·1 answer
  • In the United States, which is the President’s role as the chief of state?
    9·2 answers
  • N
    11·2 answers
  • Functionalists argue that Select one: a. social conflict among racial and ethnic groups is an important foundation of social int
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a blog tied to an individual?
    14·1 answer
  • Should Texas have or not have income taxes?
    9·1 answer
  • All the leadership styles defined by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard can be used effectively used
    12·2 answers
  • How is the constitution different from the articles of confederation
    6·2 answers
  • HELP NEEDED Look at the picture oh yeah someone gets 15 points
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!