Answer:
a) there is a chance that they can lead to errors in continued care for the patient
Explanation:
One of the results of the Schenck decision is: <span>A.The decision removed protections for dangerous speech.
Dangerous speech is not considered a heavy violation of the law due to the nature of the first amendment. For example, no matter whether a doctors is right or wrong, police could no arrest him simply just by saying "this patient couldn't be saved"</span>
The answer is the sympathetic nervous system. This regulates
the reactions of the body to an acknowledged threat and is accountable for the
"fight or flight" reaction. Over time, this over-stimulation of the
SNS can go to clear-cut marks of imbalance like: anxiety, shallow breathing,
augmented heart rate, poor quality sleep, restlessness, night
sweats, increased agitation/irritability, fatigue, and
nervousness just to name a few.
Answer:
It is an example of vote trading or logrolling
Explanation:
Logrolling consists in the exchange of favor with the aim of mutual benefit. One type of logrolling is vote trading which in this example refers to an exchange of votes in the legislature so that both legislators benefit.
Rep. Smith will probably be able to secure the passage of more funding for his district in exchange for voting to secure the passage of Rep. Hall's bill.
Well obviously the primary election takes place first
