All categories

3 years ago

3. Why haven't scholars been able to decode the Indus Script?

Social Studies

1 answer:

maksim [4K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

1 Dr Asko Parpola and Iravatham Mahadevan agreed it was syllabic writing system,but tried to read as pictograph.That is why they failed in their attempts.

2.Most of the scholars believed that the direction of writing was from Right to Left No language on earth was written from right to left during the IVC period ,Doble Hofer in his Voices in Stone has clearly stated that North Semitic people started writing from right to left during 1400 BCE while east and west Semitic people continued to write from left to right , Dravidians were right handists ,hence they could write only from left to right. Therefore R-L dogma is utterly a false one.

You might be interested in

In state government, who is responsible for electing the governor?

Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

A) all state citizens

Explanation:

I had thought it was B but i was wrong so yeah

7 0

3 years ago

Traders, religious missionaries, and colonial authorities all sought to reshape Indian society and culture. Identify the stateme

Alina [70]

Answer:

The statements that describe recurrent warfare between colonists and Indians are:

A. Colonists frequently forced out Indians, and then settled on the land that they had cleared, and

B. The conflicts resulted in feelings of superiority from the colonists and further encouraged their creation of boundaries between the two cultures.

Explanation:

The conflicts between the colonists and Indians seemed eternal as the colonists were determined to expand their dominance and the Indians were determined to protect their interests and their territory.
With the help of technically advanced warfare techniques, the colonists succeeded in making the Indians flee out of their own territories and captured the lands originally spanned by various tribes of Indian people.

4 0

3 years ago

The sun rose at 6:45 this morning: observation or inference

Ludmilka [50]

Observation. You watched the sun come up at 6:45

5 0

3 years ago

How did the Supreme Court rule on affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke? Race should be considered, but racial quot

Radda [10]

Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.

The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:

(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.

<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />

The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.

Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.

He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.

Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."

In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.

Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.

To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:

brainly.com/question/1755400

5 0

2 years ago

What foreign policy tool does nixon use most to carry out detente

Klio2033 [76]

To go beyond a threshold ban, to an agreement that will lead progressively to a total ban onnuclear testing by...

6 0

3 years ago