I believe the answer is Inference.
Inference began by collecting all the possible premises that could explain the current situation/phenomenon..
After that, we used additional evidence that found along the way to eliminate the premises that wouldn't explain the evidence.
Answer:
common couple violence
Explanation:
Common couple violence is another name of the situational couple violence which is the most common type of intimate partner violence. It reflects a mild aggressive behavior by a single argument. It is most common in the western countries where both sexes have equal rights. Most cases come from the relationship of the age group of adolescence and college-age.
Edit
The impeachment of Andrew Johnson was initiated on February 24, 1868, when the United States House of Representatives resolved to impeach Andrew Johnson, the 17th president of the United States, for "high crimes and misdemeanors," which were detailed in 11 articles of impeachment. The primary charge against Johnson was violation of the Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress in March 1867, over his veto. Specifically, he had removed from office Edwin M. Stanton, the secretary of war—whom the act was largely designed to protect—and attempted to replace him with Brevet Major General Lorenzo Thomas. (Earlier, while the Congress was not in session, Johnson had suspended Stanton and appointed General Ulysses S. Grant as secretary of war ad interim.)
Every 10 years with the new U.S. Census, state legislatures set about drawing the boundaries of electoral districts in their states. The majority party in the legislature typically exerts its influence to draw districts that are favorable to itself. For instance, Republicans may observe that Democrats in their state are packed into a few urban pockets, and consequently, they will try to district them into as few groups as possible to give more representation to their Republican voters. Both major political parties are guilty of partisan gerrymandering, but the GOP spends far more money on the practice and often aims to disenfranchise minority voices.
The origin of the term "gerrymandering" is actually one of my favorite historical tidbits. Elbridge Gerry, then governor of Massachusetts, passed a law in 1812 that consolidated the Federalists into a handful of districts and gave disproportionate voice to the Democratic-Republicans. A political cartoon noted the districts' resemblance of a salamander (see picture below), and called it the "gerry-mander."
Many agree that partisan gerrymandering is a distasteful aspect of our democracy. This year, there have been a flurry of court rulings, including before the U.S. Supreme Court, examining the constitutionality of different voting maps that appear to be designed to disenfranchise minorities. The New York Times has done some excellent coverage that I highly recommend.
The president can change things in the Constitution through executive order.
This is technically the answer, though I don’t especially like how it’s worded — a “change” in the Constitution is an amendment. The president can make amendments to the Constitution to reverse previous amendments or create new ones. Even with this power, though, the president still has to go through the people, the House of Representatives, the Senate, etc.; executive order.