Immigration is a widely practice all over the world and history of humanity, it is part of human culture to move around the world.
The roots of immigration of workers vary in time and places, so it is hard to identify who was to blame for the plight of immigrant workers, to define it we must consider each case and its parties.
Most of the time the plight of immigrant workers is the result of a combination of problems related to people country of origins and the country that receives them.
In the country of origins of immigrants we can blame things such as: bad government, environmental crisis as natural disasters, conflicts as wars or financial and economic problems. This all will motivate the immigration which can them leave workers in hard situations.
On the other side we might blame things in the country that receives the immigrant workers, as the government inaction or the inability to the country legally absorbs these workers, results of national policies for immigration and as well companies and other people who employs this immigrants taking advantage of this situation.
So due to this situation the workers will be prone to work in conditions that might be extremely harmful or danger. We can see as well people and companies that take advantage of this situation and pay low wages or don't respect work laws because this people aren't protect under this umbrella.
Because of no option many immigrant workers will submit themselves to harsh conditions of work in the country they are.
Answer:
Friendlier to the poor ( D )
Explanation:
conservatives believe that when the Government regulates the economy higher taxes are charged on the production of goods and services and this taxes are used in building Government owned infrastructures and they are redistributed to the poor through social security as well.
regulating the economy by the government has two distinct effect which can make the economy efficient or less efficient. example of such efficiency effect is charging of higher taxes on the production of harmful goods like chemicals which would have been overproduced in a free market hence creating a danger. while the effect of the inefficiency is the charging of higher taxes on the production of regular goods and services because this will reduce input into production of the goods thereby driving prices higher in the market.
Rockefeller was not a failed capitalist
Invasions by Barbarian tribes. ...
Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor. ...
The rise of the Eastern Empire. ...
The most important reason for the collapse of Rome was the failure to actually integrate what they conquered. When Roman soldiers conquered new lands, it was rare that they ever attempted to force their culture, ideals, or laws upon the natives and barbarians. Thus, when the Empire began suffering internal struggles, the natives they had conquered decided to take action, which lead to the swift collapse by barbarian invasion from all sides. It's hard to pick a LEAST important reason, seeing that there were many of them, but I suppose a contender would most likely be the common refusal of the Empire to even acknowledge that barbarians were rising. On the outer edges of their territory, in places like Gaul and Morocco, the Roman government was reluctant to even recognize the threat of the barbarians, thinking that even accepting that these barbarians were causing trouble would weaken their prestige in the public eye.
Taking into account the original statement: "Based on the information in the charts, which of the following conclusions can you draw?"
A. The Court by its actions is creating more law than the Congress.
B. The results in the graphs stem from the Senate's reluctance to confirm judicial nominees.
C. The Court overturns laws more often than it follows stare decisis.
D. The court has issued more conservative rulings when it overturns prior Court precedents.
The answer is: D.
Hope this helps.