1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
12

What did the Missouri Compromise propose?

History
2 answers:
ioda3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was both a negotiated political and legal solution. The US was already divided over the issue of slavery. Congress admitted Missouri to be part of the US as a state with legal slavery . At the same time, it admitted Maine as a free state. It was a very delicate act of balance. The congressional law also banned slavery in the remaining territories of the Louisiana Purchase north of the 36º 30’ parallel.

Explanation:

Novosadov [1.4K]3 years ago
5 0
It was a negation between the north and south as to what states could be slave states and which ones couldn’t
You might be interested in
Where would agra and balkan peninsula go?? plss help
nalin [4]

Answer:

i think  mughals

Explanation:

i really hope this helps sorry it it didnt

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the fowllowing statements apply to the middle kingdom
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

nubia

Explanation:

The statement that applies to the Middle Kingdom is that "The Egyptians control Nubia."

This is because the middle Kingdom is a period in which the successes of the ancient Egyptians stretch far and wide that it reaches the Nubian land in modern-day Ethiopia.

The Middle Kingdom was a period between the year 2030 BC to 1650 B.C.

The Middle Kingdom fell as a result of many Kings in northern Egypt beginning to split.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "The Egyptians control Nubia."

7 0
3 years ago
The difference between gentleman’s warfare and militia warfare in the revolutionary war
jekas [21]

Answer:

There's a popular belief that Americans fought and won the entire revolution with nothing but guerrilla warfare. That's not true, and the myth largely stems from how the war began. The very first military engagement between British and American forces occurred on April 19 of 1775. American militia men had been covertly transporting weapons and colonial government leaders from town to town, hiding them from the British army. The British heard about these stockpiles in the Massachusetts towns of Lexington and Concord and went to seize them. The American volunteers of these town gathered together to oppose the British, resulting in a brief skirmish. As the British beat a hasty retreat back towards Boston, American militia units basically popped out of the bushes along the entire road, shot a few volleys, and disappeared. It wasn't enough to decimate the British, but the British weren't prepared for it, and it drove them back.

Explanation:

Imagine that you are in charge of leading a small army of volunteer soldiers against the largest and most powerful professional army in the world. Are you going to march straight into battle? Not if you expect it to be a very long one!

For centuries, small armies have relied on guerrilla warfare to help even the odds. This includes non-traditional wartime tactics like ambushing, sabotage, and raids rather than direct engagements. Guerrilla warfare is not meant to really defeat an opponent; instead, the idea is to make the war drag on and become so expensive that your adversary gives up. It's the different between fighting a professional boxer versus a swarm of mosquitoes - the mosquitoes won't kill you, but they just may drive you away.

Amongst the many armies to try out these tactics were the American colonists fighting for their independence. The American Revolution was a conflict between a group of volunteers and a massive professional army. Did they think they could defeat Britain, the heavyweight champion of European colonialism? Maybe not, but while Britain prepared to defend its title, it was the colonists who learned how to 'float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.'

8 0
3 years ago
Did the europeans and colonization have a negative or positive impact on money, wealth, power
77julia77 [94]
The answer to your question I believe is negative.


5 0
3 years ago
Why is Mr. Auld angry when he finds that Mrs.
ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

I think D and B is the correct answers.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which of the following changes occurred as a result of henry ford's mass production of the automobile? a. Oil exploration signif
    9·2 answers
  • What three nations formed the Axis Powers during World War II?
    6·1 answer
  • Briefly describe the duties of the secretary of state in state government.
    7·2 answers
  • The three aspects of suffering that Buddha described in his famous sermon are the _____ of suffering, the _____ of suffering, th
    15·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE AND PLEASE DON'T GUESS BECAUSE I REALLY NEED TO PASS AND NEED HELP!
    5·1 answer
  • Which best decribes a clan​
    9·2 answers
  • Who benefited from the reconstruction finance corporation
    9·1 answer
  • Witch best explains why the church was powerful
    8·1 answer
  • In order to establish the Ming dynasty in China, Hongwu first had to drive out the
    8·2 answers
  • In paragraph 4 of a letter to my nephew write 4 words that are repeated at least twice
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!