Answer:
<em><u>short-termism
</u></em>
Is the acting upon short term vision of the needs and problems that must be addressed. It is a problem because the vision that is important is the Long path vision.
<em><u>What is “longpath” and why did Wallach develop the concept? </u></em>
Is a concept that combines long term vision and goal oriented. Wallach develop that concept as he did not find a term that frame what is intended in the long run that was goal oriented.
<em><u>Briefly discuss each of the three ways of thinking that Wallach describes. </u></em>
Transgenerational thinking: Thinking the impact of your actions in the future generations to come.
Futures thinking: The future is not related only with better technology but with how will human relationships, moral, art and feelings like compassion will evolve.
Telos thinking: This is an invitation to think having in mind what is the "ultimate aim" of our actions as little of they might be. It is important to raise the question: how this action that I am doing now will impact or change the future in 20,50 or 100 years to come.
<em><u>How does Wallach relate the future to a part of speech?
</u></em>
Wallach make a link between Thomas Khun quote: “People don’t shift unless they have a vision of what it is they’re shifting to.” an Martin Luther King Speech of "I Have a Dream" he says that that speech is successful as it shows what is the vision of what a dream must looks like
Answer: Wages are flexible if the economy is self-regulating.
Explanation:
Classical economists believe that the economy is self-regulating. This means that if the economy is not at equilibrium, it will return to equilibrium if it is left without interference.
For this to happen, inputs such as wages have to flexible to enable them to adjust to market conditions and thus take the Economy back to equilibrium.
For instance, if there is a recession, wages will reduce so that the prices that the producers can charge will reduce as well which will enable supply to match demand and bring the economy back to equilibrium.
Answer
adjective
1.
first in order of importance; main.
"the country's principal cities"
Similar:
main
chief
primary
leading
foremost
first
most important
predominant
dominant
(most) prominent
key
crucial
vital
essential
basic
staple
critical
pivotal
salient
prime
central
focal
premier
paramount
major
ruling
master
supreme
overriding
cardinal
capital
preeminent
ultimate
uppermost
highest
utmost
top
topmost
arch-
number-one
Opposite:
minor
subordinate
subsidiary
2.
(of money) denoting an original sum invested or lent.
"the principal amount of your investment"
noun
1.
the person with the highest authority or most important position in an organization, institution, or group.
"a design consultancy whose principal is based in San Francisco"
Similar:
boss
chief
chief executive (officer)
CEO
chairman
chairwoman
managing director
MD
president
director
manager
employer
head
leader
ruler
controller
head honcho
gaffer
governor
guv'nor
2.
a sum of money lent or invested, on which interest is paid.
"the winners are paid from the interest without even touching the principal"
Similar:
capital sum
capital
capital funds
working capital
Answer:
Net income of the company accounted for $400,000
Explanation:
Net income is the income or the amount of residual income from the earnings after deducting all the expense or cost from the sales.
The net income or loss of the company accounted for is computed as:
Net Income or Loss = Net Income - Research and Development cost
where
Net Income amounts to $3,400,000
Research and Development cost amounts to $3,000,000
So, putting the values above:
Net Income or loss = $3,400,000 - $3,000,000
Net Income = $400,000
Answer:
The depreciation expense for the first two years is $72,000.
Explanation:
Under straight-line method, depreciation expense is (Cost - Residual value) / No of years = ($400,000 - $40,000) / 10 years = $36,000 yearly depreciation expense.
Using this method, the depreciation expense for the first two years is $36,000 x 2 years = $72,000. This amount is regarded as the accumulated depreciation at the end of Year 2 while the net book value would be $400,000 - $72,000 = $328,000.
