The authors mean that you can't discriminate against someone because of the color of their skin or the problems they may have.
The correct answer would be, Humanistic Approach to Psychotherapy.
Mariam also suggests ways to bridge the gap between what Santiago actually is and what Santiago wants to become. In this scenario, it can be inferred that Mariam is adopting the Humanistic Approach to Psychotherapy.
Explanation:
Humanistic Approach to Psychotherapy is a therapeutic approach in psychology, which emphasizes on the fulfillment of people's potential and on maximizing their well being.
In this approach, the person is analyzed as a whole individual and human being. Concepts like free will, self-efficacy, and self-actualization are being stressed out using this therapy.
So when Mariam used this approach, she tried to bridge the gap between what her patient actually is and what Santiago wants to become. She emphasized on her free will, self efficacy and self actualization.
Learn more about Humanistic Approach at:
brainly.com/question/3697847
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Muir describes his traitorous journey he had to embark through the swamp and narrate how the trip was dangerous and uneasy. He uses words such as difficult, struggling, fear, extensive, crooked, brood heaps, faint, hungry and tangled to depicts the severity of the event. Muir uses diction with a negative connotation to elicit the fear and concern that he felt when he became worried whether or not he'd be able to make it out of the swamp before night.
<span>The answer is
b. Fifth Amendment. It is also known as “Pleading
the Fifth”. It is used for citing t<span>he freedom </span>that
allows a witness to refuse to answer questions where the answers might implicate
him or her to avoid suffering a penalty for declaring the benefit. A defendant
cannot be forced to become a witness at his or her own trial. But he or she decides
to testify, he or she is not eligible to the privilege, and in conclusion can
be drawn for refusing to answer a question while being cross-examined in court.<span> </span></span>