1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
14

Why was the North worried about political power?

History
1 answer:
Nina [5.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:After the war of 1812, it seemed to men like Henry Clay and John Calhoun that the United States needed to find a way to become stronger and more independent.  They and people who shared their beliefs came to be called National Republicans.  By 1819, when a great economic depression struck the nation, it was extremely apparent that the current economic system was not working at all.  Also in 1819, when Missouri petitioned to join the Union as a slave state, officials realized that in order to maintain the union, slavery could not figure into politics.  Building on these ideas, the National Republicans created a system that concentrated on strengthening industry and infrastructure while ignoring issues like slavery . The system that Henry Clay spearheaded was called the American System.  It included a restrictive tariff on trade goods such as glassware, china, shoes, and tailored items.  The purpose of the tariff was to boost United States industry and crafting, which it succeeded in when placed in conjunction with advances in transportation.  In 1816, Congress passed bills to promote internal improvements.  As a result of this, many roads, canals, and railroads were built, including the National Road and the Eire Canal.  These revolutions in transportation made working in more rural areas more plausible as those same rural areas became accessible by road, rail, or canal.  Also because of these advances came large changes in manufacturing and land use. Originally, American crafting was much like European crafting:  it worked within the system of a Master, Journeyman, and Apprentice skill levels.  An apprentice would work for a master, learning the skill and eventually becoming a journeyman, crafters who worked for masters in order to earn enough money to open their own shop and thus become masters themselves.  With the revolution in transportation and the demand for large quantities of low-quality goods, the nature of crafting changed dramatically.  Instead of a few people knowing all of a craft and doing excellent work on it, masters began to hire people to do one small part of the job and pay by the piece.  In the end, they would have a lower quality finished product, but more of it.  These they could sell at a higher profit margin and in larger quantities, thus making far more money.  Land use likewise changed as farming began to fall out of favor and support moved toward industry.  Instrumental in supporting this change in the way land was used was the judiciary.

   During this period, the United States Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall set several precedents and generally supported industrial use of the land, which was a far cry from the former common law idea of how land should be used.  Under common law, the general belief was that land should be used for farming, not industry.  Through several cases, one of which being the Dartmouth College Case in 1819, the court ruled in favor of Dartmouth College, which was selling land to local entrepreneurs.  This case redefined the definition of a corporation and strengthened the idea that the Supreme Court could overturn the rulings of lower courts, a precedent set in 1816 with Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee.  

You might be interested in
How accurate is the headline "Study Shows Farmers Spend Several Hours Playing Cards Each Day": mostly accurate, partly accurate,
KengaRu [80]

Answer: yes they do because they are very bored and have nothing to do so they whip out the cards.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
ILL MARK BRAINLY!!!!!!!!!!!Infer: If Columbus and all European explorers had been kind, and helpful, and never deliberately harm
Tresset [83]

Answer:

A) The natives would have been wiped out by smallpox and other European diseases anyway, since they had no immunity

Explanation:

Even if the Europeans were not cruel and aggressive toward the native populations of the Americas, the end result wouldn't have been much different. The reason for this is that the majority of the deaths of the Native Americans came from the European diseases, as their immune system was not able to cope with them. Yes, there were lot of deaths caused by wars, torture, and forced labor, but compared to the deaths caused by diseases they comprise a very small percentage. The Europeans didn't wanted to wipe out the native populations at all, as their plan was to use them as labor force on their plantations, but that didn't came to be, as the diseases they brought with them had an effect similar to the one of the plague in Europe.

7 0
3 years ago
Members of Congress agreed to the Missouri Compromise in an attempt to prevent serious conflict. Write a letter to a member of C
Oksanka [162]
Here is information that will help you write either letter.

Reasons for Missouri Compromise
1) Allows the US to add more states. If this is passed, Missouri and Maine will become states.
2) This act gives us a short term solution for slavery. The 36’30 line allows all US state to understand where slavery can and cannot exist.
3) Maintains a balance of slave and free states in the US Congress.

Reasons against compromise
1) Doesn’t provide a long term solution to slavery. With this act, it establishes a temporary line but what happens when a new territory wants to come into the US and throws of the balance of slave and free states in Congress?
3 0
3 years ago
Match the following events to the effects they produced.
kenny6666 [7]
A) Hundred years war
B) Italian Wars


Italy was never a nation-state, therefore it turned into a power vacuum -The fall of Constantinople (this limited trade) -Failure of the Peace of Lodi -Sforza invited Charles VIII of France in to Italy to invade
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did President Jackson believe nullification crisis would
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

Andrew Jackson, generally in favor of states' rights, saw nullification as a threat to the Union. In his view, the federal government derived its power from the people, not from the states, and the federal laws had greater authority than those of the individual states.

Explanation:

I hope it helps

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which explains what George Rogers Clark, the Marquis de Lafayette, and George Washington had in common?
    8·1 answer
  • Think about what later Northeast and Southeast American Indian groups had in common. Which of these statements describes how the
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Which was the most important development during the woodland period?
    14·1 answer
  • In the balance between liberty and equality, which one would you emphasize? Why?
    5·1 answer
  • Federal trade act aims
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following has pure market economy
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the renowned American philosopher who made notable contributions in his
    5·1 answer
  • The area called the Fertile Crescent was home to early civilization. All of the following contributed to the rich and fertile so
    5·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.<br> How many articles does the Constitution have?
    10·2 answers
  • What was significant about the Declaration of Independence?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!