1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
14

Why was the North worried about political power?

History
1 answer:
Nina [5.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:After the war of 1812, it seemed to men like Henry Clay and John Calhoun that the United States needed to find a way to become stronger and more independent.  They and people who shared their beliefs came to be called National Republicans.  By 1819, when a great economic depression struck the nation, it was extremely apparent that the current economic system was not working at all.  Also in 1819, when Missouri petitioned to join the Union as a slave state, officials realized that in order to maintain the union, slavery could not figure into politics.  Building on these ideas, the National Republicans created a system that concentrated on strengthening industry and infrastructure while ignoring issues like slavery . The system that Henry Clay spearheaded was called the American System.  It included a restrictive tariff on trade goods such as glassware, china, shoes, and tailored items.  The purpose of the tariff was to boost United States industry and crafting, which it succeeded in when placed in conjunction with advances in transportation.  In 1816, Congress passed bills to promote internal improvements.  As a result of this, many roads, canals, and railroads were built, including the National Road and the Eire Canal.  These revolutions in transportation made working in more rural areas more plausible as those same rural areas became accessible by road, rail, or canal.  Also because of these advances came large changes in manufacturing and land use. Originally, American crafting was much like European crafting:  it worked within the system of a Master, Journeyman, and Apprentice skill levels.  An apprentice would work for a master, learning the skill and eventually becoming a journeyman, crafters who worked for masters in order to earn enough money to open their own shop and thus become masters themselves.  With the revolution in transportation and the demand for large quantities of low-quality goods, the nature of crafting changed dramatically.  Instead of a few people knowing all of a craft and doing excellent work on it, masters began to hire people to do one small part of the job and pay by the piece.  In the end, they would have a lower quality finished product, but more of it.  These they could sell at a higher profit margin and in larger quantities, thus making far more money.  Land use likewise changed as farming began to fall out of favor and support moved toward industry.  Instrumental in supporting this change in the way land was used was the judiciary.

   During this period, the United States Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall set several precedents and generally supported industrial use of the land, which was a far cry from the former common law idea of how land should be used.  Under common law, the general belief was that land should be used for farming, not industry.  Through several cases, one of which being the Dartmouth College Case in 1819, the court ruled in favor of Dartmouth College, which was selling land to local entrepreneurs.  This case redefined the definition of a corporation and strengthened the idea that the Supreme Court could overturn the rulings of lower courts, a precedent set in 1816 with Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee.  

You might be interested in
How did the ambitions of Charles II and James II remake English North America?
MAXImum [283]

New York was named after Charles II and James II dominate the British Colonies which laid an impact on America.

The British king Charles II took control over Dutch colony New Netherland  in the Second Anglo-Dutch war as a result of English settlement.

He handed over the colony to James who later renamed it as New York in the honour of Charles.  

With his dominance over the British Colonies and good administration James II laid an impact on remaking of North America.

8 0
3 years ago
Write a two- or three-sentence statement that
kakasveta [241]

I believe that this is an opinion question that only you can answer

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summarize how rome defeated hannibal.
pav-90 [236]

Answer:

Hannibal made one major tactical error: He did not attack and capture Rome when he had the opportunity.

Hannibal conducted his operations in Italy not as one campaign in a larger war but as the only campaign in the only war. He seemed to hold to the conviction that if he won enough battles, he would win Italy. And if he won Italy, victory over the Roman people would be his. Battles are the means to a strategic end, not ends in themselves. Hannibal was a sworn enemy of the Romans and he let his emotions cloud out that fact when he launched the second Punic War. He could win every battle, but he did not apply those battles to wining the war.

There seemed to be some confusion between tactics and strategy in his mind. This caused him to commit a number of operational failures that led to his eventual defeat in Romes heartland.

The Carthaginian senate had failed to send him critical supplies and troops when most needed. He had severe logistical problems. Tactics win battles, logistics win wars. There was no good reason why supply transports could not have gotten through to Hannibal.

Moronically, Carthage’s strategic shift away from Italy after Cannae came at a time when Hannibal’s momentum was at its full. Cannae was an absolutely devastating defeat for the Romans. Politics.

Hannibal was eventually called back to Carthage because of the military failures of his compatriots. The Romans had pushed into Carthaginian territory, and they needed reinforcements.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Because unions and strikes were banned by the government,
icang [17]
Because Union and strikes were banned by the government WORKERS' WAGES DECREASES.
By abolishing Unions and the right of the workers to stage strike, the government gave enormous power to the industrialists and this led to decrease in the wages of the workers. This was majorly because, the employers knew that the workers have no other choice but to accept what they are offered. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the causes and effects of spread of islam
3241004551 [841]
War, and Iraq - which leads to death
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What idea did john locke advocate for the roll of government?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the successful overthrow of the Iranian government in 1979 signify?
    12·1 answer
  • How does the Slavery Grievance describe slavery?
    8·1 answer
  • Which European
    6·1 answer
  • Help Me!————————SPANISH SUBJECT DOESNT HELP a lot with this, but y’all are cool.
    14·1 answer
  • Who is the president of the United States
    6·2 answers
  • What is industry (or industrialization)?
    10·2 answers
  • In three to five sentences, explain how British taxes influenced the actions of the colonists and led to the American Revolution
    9·2 answers
  • The Sioux migrated from the
    14·2 answers
  • How has the population in Ghana changed from how it was thousands of years ago?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!