The responsibility for evaluating new technologies, new ideas, and new capabilities and identifying those that are most relevant to the organization is typically assigned to the <u>Chief technology officer (CTO)</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
The chief technology officer (CTO) is the highest technical leadership position within a company, leading the technical or engineering department. Create policies and procedures and use technology to improve our external customer-focused products and services.
The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is the executive responsible for overseeing the entire IT department and integrating business needs and requirements into IT planning and operations. It's important to distinguish their role from that of the Chief Information Officer (CIO). The Chief Information Officer (CIO) role focuses on technology that internally guides an organization through the management of its infrastructure. The Chief Technology Officer has a job description focused on developing technologies for customer sales and the external growth of the company. The CTO and her CIO often combine their technical and engineering knowledge to work together for the benefit of the entire organization.
<u></u>
Learn more about the Chief technology office here brainly.com/question/17999351
#SPJ4
Answer:
in my best defence, the answer is 22
Explanation:
Business processes implement value chains or portions of value chains. Each value chain is supported by one or more business process. The information systems are then implemented in order to make the operation <span>run smoothly and productively.</span>
Answer:
The answer is: The excise tax on cola beverages is $2 per case.
Explanation:
Excise taxes are taxes levied on certain goods or services.
In this case the price of cola beverages is $4 per case, since excise taxes are included in the price of the product, then the excise tax on cola beverages = price paid by consumers - price received by producers = $4 - $2 = $2
Answer:
The correct word for the blank space is: did not.
Explanation:
The Kuehn v. Pub Zone is a court case where Karl Kuehn sued Maria Kerkoulas -the owner of Pub Zone bar in Union, New Jersey- because Kuehn was beaten by a motorcycle gang inside the men's bathroom of Pub Zone. Kerkoulas had knowledge of the irrational behavior of motorcycle gangs in the area though, on the day when the attack took place, the Pagan's gang surpassed security in Pub Zone yet Kerkoulas decided to attend them. Later, the gang was heading towards the back of the pub. Kerkoulas thought they were leaving but they were following Kuehn to the men's bathroom where he was seriously injured.
Kuehn sued Pub Zone and the jury awarded $300,000 in damages but the trial court judge overruled the jury's decision and Pub Zone ended up owing nothing to Kuehn. <em>The owner of a business is not the insurer of the customers and has no duty on any care of one of them until a major event occurs</em>. Then, even if Kerkoulas knew about the behavior of the motorcycle gang, she is not responsible for the care of Kuehn on the gang attacking him.
