Answer and Explanation:
The answer that makes the most sense is D) Text Details.
A isn't the answer because this is something we would hear/read about first to know what is happening and to get details of who the character is before diving into the story. This is information about a character.
B isn't the answer because conclusions would be made near the end or middle of the story, where we make inferences and conclusions of what happens when the story ends. This would be Inference.
C isn't the answer because we are being told the traits of a person. This answer and A could possibly be background knowledge, as we get to know the character before the story begins so we aren't lost, we could learn about these during the story as well. This is information about a character.
D is correct because we are given text details about the story/character. We would be given things like how they ended up in the beginning situation, where they are from, why they are here, etc.
<u><em>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</em></u>
The answer is not A, because it is not clear enough. Who's we?
The answer is not B, the sentence is not clear about the building they are visiting.
The answer is not C, it's not clear about what building they are talking about.
So your answer is D.
Answer:
B. Evidence from a number of expert sources suggests that schools should design more nutritious lunch menus.
Explanation:
As for this question together with the options presented with it, the most probable answer and the most likely one to be the correct answer is the third option which is C. group discussions.
Though critical listening can also be utilized in the other situations presented as options, critical listening would be very useful during group discussions. During conversation with friends and family, it isn't advisable since it might ruin the bond build between parties and might instigate something worse. During a play, yes, you can, but not all the time. In persuasive speeches, it is more on the details that are being thrown.
