Answer:
$3.60
Step-by-step explanation:
Convert the percentage to a decimal.
2% = 0.02
Multiply the cost of the dress by the decimal to find the sales tax.
$180 × 0.02 = $3.60
The sales tax $3.60.
What do you mean? You deposited $50 didn’t you? HUuH
Answer:
0.3101001000......
0.410100100010000....
Step-by-step explanation:
To find irrational number between any two numbers, we first need to understand what a rational and irrational number is.
Rational number is any number that can be expressed in fraction of form
. Since q can be 1, all numbers that terminate are rational numbers. Example: 1, 12.34, 123.66663
Irrational number on the other hand can't be expressed as a fraction and do not terminate. Also, there is no pattern in numbers i.e. there is no repetition in numbers after the decimal point.
For example: 3.44444..... can be expressed as rational number 3.45.
But 3.414114111.... is an irrational number as there no pattern observed. Also,it does not terminate.
We can find infinite number of irrational numbers in between two rational numbers.
<u>Irrational numbers in between 0.3 and 0.7:</u>
0.3101001000......
0.410100100010000....
0.51010010001.......
0.6101001000....
There are many others. We can choose any two as answers.
Answer:
6 hours 30 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
morning work=3 hours 45 minutes
afternoon work=2 hours 45 minutes
total hours=?
Here,
3 hours 45 minutes+2 hours 45 minutes
=6 hours 30 minutes
Therefore,Terry Baelett worked 6hours 30 minutes a day.
Answer:
(1) D.Angle C is congruent to to Angle F. (2) C. SSS. (3) C. cannot be congruent to.
Step-by-step explanation:
1)
From the given figure it is noticed that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/016a1/016a15e974cb553d4eea66bc2ced27295dc69f58" alt="AC=EG"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d14f2/d14f2cce3e6a96247b60ebe6e682798f02d9e324" alt="CB=GF"
According to SAS postulate, if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then both triangles are congruent.
The included angles of congruent sides are angle C and angle G.
So, condition "Angle C is congruent to to Angle F" will prove that the ∆ABC and ∆EFG are congruent by the SAS criterion.
2)
If data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e105/6e105d6c6134dbf17e78a0099bfba8618fb1e64e" alt="AB\neq EF"
According to SSS postulate, if all three sides in one triangle are congruent to the corresponding sides in the other.
Since two corresponding sides are congruent but third sides of triangles are not congruent, therefore SSS criterion for congruence is violated.
3)
Since two corresponding sides are congruent but third sides of triangles are not congruent, therefore the included angle of congruent sides are different.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bc9e/3bc9e3a2e2e6e6d747b65c2b9b4caa4acba70058" alt="\angle C\neq \angle G"
Therefore angle C and angle F cannot be congruent to each other.