1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
3 years ago
11

Why did the United States send troops into a Iraq 2003

History
2 answers:
pogonyaev3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the first stage of the Iraq War. The invasion phase began on 19 March 2003 (air) and 20 March 2003 (ground) and lasted just over one month, including 26 days of major combat operations, in which a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq.

Mariana [72]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the first stage of the Iraq War. The invasion phase began on 19 March 2003 (air) and 20 March 2003 (ground) and lasted just over one month,[24] including 26 days of major combat operations, in which a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq. This early stage of the war formally ended on 1 May 2003 when U.S. President George W. Bush declared the "end of major combat operations", after which the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) was established as the first of several successive transitional governments leading up to the first Iraqi parliamentary election in January 2005. U.S. military forces later remained in Iraq until the withdrawal in 2011.[25]

The U.S.-led coalition sent 177,194 troops into Iraq during the initial invasion phase, which lasted from 19 March to 1 May 2003. About 130,000 arrived from the U.S. alone, with about 45,000 British soldiers, 2,000 Australian soldiers, and 194 Polish soldiers. 36 other countries were involved in its aftermath. In preparation for the invasion, 100,000 U.S. troops assembled in Kuwait by 18 February.[26] The coalition forces also received support from the Peshmerga in Iraqi Kurdistan.

According to U.S. President George W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, the coalition aimed "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people."[27] Others place a much greater emphasis on the impact of the September 11 attacks, on the role this played in changing U.S. strategic calculations, and the rise of the freedom agenda.[28][29] According to Blair, the trigger was Iraq's failure to take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of alleged nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that U.S. and British officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace.[30]

In a January 2003 CBS poll, 64% of Americans had approved of military action against Iraq; however, 63% wanted Bush to find a diplomatic solution rather than go to war, and 62% believed the threat of terrorism directed against the U.S. would increase due to war.[31] The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some long-standing U.S. allies, including the governments of France, Canada, Germany, and New Zealand.[32][33][34] Their leaders argued that there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and that invading that country was not justified in the context of UNMOVIC's 12 February 2003 report. About 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs were discovered during the Iraq War, but these had been built and abandoned earlier in Saddam Hussein's rule before the 1991 Gulf War. The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government's invasion rationale.[35][36]

On 15 February 2003, a month before the invasion, there were worldwide protests against the Iraq War, including a rally of three million people in Rome, which the Guinness Book of Records listed as the largest ever anti-war rally.[37] According to the French academic Dominique Reynié, between 3 January and 12 April 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the Iraq war.[38]

The invasion was preceded by an airstrike on the Presidential Palace in Baghdad on 20 March 2003. The following day, coalition forces launched an incursion into Basra Province from their massing point close to the Iraqi-Kuwaiti border. While special forces launched an amphibious assault from the Persian Gulf to secure Basra and the surrounding petroleum fields, the main invasion army moved into southern Iraq, occupying the region and engaging in the Battle of Nasiriyah on 23 March. Massive air strikes across the country and against Iraqi command-and-control threw the defending army into chaos and prevented an effective resistance. On 26 March, the 173rd Airborne Brigade was airdropped near the northern city of Kirkuk, where they joined forces with Kurdish rebels and fought several actions against the Iraqi Army to secure the northern part of the country.

The main body of coalition forces continued their drive into the heart of Iraq and met with little resistance. Most of the Iraqi military was quickly defeated and the coalition occupied Baghdad on 9 April. Other operations occurred against pockets of the Iraqi Army, including the capture and occupation of Kirkuk on 10 April, and the attack on and capture of Tikrit on 15 April. Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and the central leadership went into hiding as the coalition forces completed the occupation of the country. On 1 May President George W. Bush declared an end to major combat operations: this ended the invasion period and began the period of military occupation.

You might be interested in
The Teapot Dome scandal involved: a. the attorney general, who took bribes not to prosecute accused criminals. b. Herbert Hoover
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

Option: d. the secretary of the interior, who received money in exchange for leasing government oil reserves to private companies.

Explanation:

The Teapot Dome scandal appeared in America in the 1920s when Albert Fall, Secretary of the Interior,  was accused of taking bribes from fuel companies ( Harry F. Sinclair. and Edward L. Doheny) in exchange for permissions to drill on federal land for oil. The scandal shocked the American people because it exposed corruption and greed present in the government.

8 0
4 years ago
what was the main reason that the constitution did not Proclaim that all men were born free and equal in their rights
kati45 [8]
The main reason that the Constitution did not proclaim all men to be free and equal is because of the issue of slavery. Many of the Founding Fathers were slaveowners, including George Washington. The Founding Fathers did not want to lose the support of southern states when it came time to ratify the Constitution.
4 0
3 years ago
What role did women fill during World War II
Colt1911 [192]

Approximately 350,000 American women joined the military during World War II. They worked as nurses, drove trucks, repaired airplanes, and performed clerical work to free up men for combat.

Many women also left the homestead to work in factories during the war, producing many of the resources that were in dire need to the country during the time.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is/was a KV-1? Please describe where it came from.
nikdorinn [45]
<span>It was a russian world war two tank</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
All of the following are examples of safeguards of individual civil liberties, except
a_sh-v [17]
D. hope this helps :3 (:




5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Historical relief narratives were recovered from the palace of...
    11·1 answer
  • What did the Xiongnu gain when they defeated the Han Chinese?
    6·2 answers
  • Select the factors that improve human capital
    15·2 answers
  • What was the symbol of the end of the Cold War?
    7·1 answer
  • Which three areas within the Fertile Crescent were home to early civilizations? Greece India Mesopotamia Egypt Rome Israel
    6·2 answers
  • Why does Zeus think Percy stole the bolt?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the MAIN idea of the section "People And Culture"?
    6·1 answer
  • According to Alan Singer, why are many people surprised when we talk about slavery in the North?
    12·1 answer
  • how did the chicago community respond to the jbts? what were the outcomes for the victims of the scandal??
    15·1 answer
  • In this activity, you will analyze and discuss the significance of one primary source document around the idea of labor unions.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!