1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
3 years ago
11

Why did the United States send troops into a Iraq 2003

History
2 answers:
pogonyaev3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the first stage of the Iraq War. The invasion phase began on 19 March 2003 (air) and 20 March 2003 (ground) and lasted just over one month, including 26 days of major combat operations, in which a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq.

Mariana [72]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the first stage of the Iraq War. The invasion phase began on 19 March 2003 (air) and 20 March 2003 (ground) and lasted just over one month,[24] including 26 days of major combat operations, in which a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq. This early stage of the war formally ended on 1 May 2003 when U.S. President George W. Bush declared the "end of major combat operations", after which the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) was established as the first of several successive transitional governments leading up to the first Iraqi parliamentary election in January 2005. U.S. military forces later remained in Iraq until the withdrawal in 2011.[25]

The U.S.-led coalition sent 177,194 troops into Iraq during the initial invasion phase, which lasted from 19 March to 1 May 2003. About 130,000 arrived from the U.S. alone, with about 45,000 British soldiers, 2,000 Australian soldiers, and 194 Polish soldiers. 36 other countries were involved in its aftermath. In preparation for the invasion, 100,000 U.S. troops assembled in Kuwait by 18 February.[26] The coalition forces also received support from the Peshmerga in Iraqi Kurdistan.

According to U.S. President George W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, the coalition aimed "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people."[27] Others place a much greater emphasis on the impact of the September 11 attacks, on the role this played in changing U.S. strategic calculations, and the rise of the freedom agenda.[28][29] According to Blair, the trigger was Iraq's failure to take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of alleged nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that U.S. and British officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace.[30]

In a January 2003 CBS poll, 64% of Americans had approved of military action against Iraq; however, 63% wanted Bush to find a diplomatic solution rather than go to war, and 62% believed the threat of terrorism directed against the U.S. would increase due to war.[31] The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some long-standing U.S. allies, including the governments of France, Canada, Germany, and New Zealand.[32][33][34] Their leaders argued that there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and that invading that country was not justified in the context of UNMOVIC's 12 February 2003 report. About 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs were discovered during the Iraq War, but these had been built and abandoned earlier in Saddam Hussein's rule before the 1991 Gulf War. The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government's invasion rationale.[35][36]

On 15 February 2003, a month before the invasion, there were worldwide protests against the Iraq War, including a rally of three million people in Rome, which the Guinness Book of Records listed as the largest ever anti-war rally.[37] According to the French academic Dominique Reynié, between 3 January and 12 April 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the Iraq war.[38]

The invasion was preceded by an airstrike on the Presidential Palace in Baghdad on 20 March 2003. The following day, coalition forces launched an incursion into Basra Province from their massing point close to the Iraqi-Kuwaiti border. While special forces launched an amphibious assault from the Persian Gulf to secure Basra and the surrounding petroleum fields, the main invasion army moved into southern Iraq, occupying the region and engaging in the Battle of Nasiriyah on 23 March. Massive air strikes across the country and against Iraqi command-and-control threw the defending army into chaos and prevented an effective resistance. On 26 March, the 173rd Airborne Brigade was airdropped near the northern city of Kirkuk, where they joined forces with Kurdish rebels and fought several actions against the Iraqi Army to secure the northern part of the country.

The main body of coalition forces continued their drive into the heart of Iraq and met with little resistance. Most of the Iraqi military was quickly defeated and the coalition occupied Baghdad on 9 April. Other operations occurred against pockets of the Iraqi Army, including the capture and occupation of Kirkuk on 10 April, and the attack on and capture of Tikrit on 15 April. Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and the central leadership went into hiding as the coalition forces completed the occupation of the country. On 1 May President George W. Bush declared an end to major combat operations: this ended the invasion period and began the period of military occupation.

You might be interested in
Most americans believed prosperity would go on forever during the 1920's, true or false?
bazaltina [42]
True.  Buying on margin.  Economy people were making some serious money.    Farms were doing great, until late 1920's.  
8 0
3 years ago
How did the English Bill of Rights limit the power of the monarch? A)The monarch could not levy taxes without a specific grant f
levacccp [35]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

the parliament was finally able to check the powers of the monarch. the monarch was restricted on things like levying taxes, declaring war, forming an army, etc. the monarch was unable to do that without the parliament's agreement

6 0
3 years ago
Which is an example of economic anti-Semitism?
harina [27]

Answer:

Claiming Jews have taken over certain industries

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are Supreme Court Justices appointed?
DIA [1.3K]
The president appoints them, then they go through approval by the Senate
8 0
3 years ago
The Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, contained a clause that blamed the war on what people?
erastova [34]
The treaty of Versailles blamed the Germans for causing the war, even though it was the Austrians who started the war. The answer is that the allied powers blamed The Empire of Germany.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are 2 positives of andrew Carnegie and 2 negatives
    9·1 answer
  • Which area of florida has the fewest people?Why do you think so few people live in this area
    8·1 answer
  • 1. W. E. B. Du Bois:
    14·1 answer
  • What was the main reason for the military buildup prior to WWI
    11·2 answers
  • A source that is written or created by a person who experienced an event personally is called a
    11·1 answer
  • The Phoenicians were called the Purple People after one of their most famous products. What was that product and why was it impo
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the actions of General Sibley during the Civil War.
    7·2 answers
  • I need help I can't see unswers what should I do....
    5·1 answer
  • Unsung Heroes of freedom struggle ???​
    5·2 answers
  • What was George Washingtons stance on slavery
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!