1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
2 years ago
11

Why did the United States send troops into a Iraq 2003

History
2 answers:
pogonyaev2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the first stage of the Iraq War. The invasion phase began on 19 March 2003 (air) and 20 March 2003 (ground) and lasted just over one month, including 26 days of major combat operations, in which a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq.

Mariana [72]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the first stage of the Iraq War. The invasion phase began on 19 March 2003 (air) and 20 March 2003 (ground) and lasted just over one month,[24] including 26 days of major combat operations, in which a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq. This early stage of the war formally ended on 1 May 2003 when U.S. President George W. Bush declared the "end of major combat operations", after which the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) was established as the first of several successive transitional governments leading up to the first Iraqi parliamentary election in January 2005. U.S. military forces later remained in Iraq until the withdrawal in 2011.[25]

The U.S.-led coalition sent 177,194 troops into Iraq during the initial invasion phase, which lasted from 19 March to 1 May 2003. About 130,000 arrived from the U.S. alone, with about 45,000 British soldiers, 2,000 Australian soldiers, and 194 Polish soldiers. 36 other countries were involved in its aftermath. In preparation for the invasion, 100,000 U.S. troops assembled in Kuwait by 18 February.[26] The coalition forces also received support from the Peshmerga in Iraqi Kurdistan.

According to U.S. President George W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, the coalition aimed "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people."[27] Others place a much greater emphasis on the impact of the September 11 attacks, on the role this played in changing U.S. strategic calculations, and the rise of the freedom agenda.[28][29] According to Blair, the trigger was Iraq's failure to take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of alleged nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that U.S. and British officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace.[30]

In a January 2003 CBS poll, 64% of Americans had approved of military action against Iraq; however, 63% wanted Bush to find a diplomatic solution rather than go to war, and 62% believed the threat of terrorism directed against the U.S. would increase due to war.[31] The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some long-standing U.S. allies, including the governments of France, Canada, Germany, and New Zealand.[32][33][34] Their leaders argued that there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and that invading that country was not justified in the context of UNMOVIC's 12 February 2003 report. About 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs were discovered during the Iraq War, but these had been built and abandoned earlier in Saddam Hussein's rule before the 1991 Gulf War. The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government's invasion rationale.[35][36]

On 15 February 2003, a month before the invasion, there were worldwide protests against the Iraq War, including a rally of three million people in Rome, which the Guinness Book of Records listed as the largest ever anti-war rally.[37] According to the French academic Dominique Reynié, between 3 January and 12 April 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the Iraq war.[38]

The invasion was preceded by an airstrike on the Presidential Palace in Baghdad on 20 March 2003. The following day, coalition forces launched an incursion into Basra Province from their massing point close to the Iraqi-Kuwaiti border. While special forces launched an amphibious assault from the Persian Gulf to secure Basra and the surrounding petroleum fields, the main invasion army moved into southern Iraq, occupying the region and engaging in the Battle of Nasiriyah on 23 March. Massive air strikes across the country and against Iraqi command-and-control threw the defending army into chaos and prevented an effective resistance. On 26 March, the 173rd Airborne Brigade was airdropped near the northern city of Kirkuk, where they joined forces with Kurdish rebels and fought several actions against the Iraqi Army to secure the northern part of the country.

The main body of coalition forces continued their drive into the heart of Iraq and met with little resistance. Most of the Iraqi military was quickly defeated and the coalition occupied Baghdad on 9 April. Other operations occurred against pockets of the Iraqi Army, including the capture and occupation of Kirkuk on 10 April, and the attack on and capture of Tikrit on 15 April. Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and the central leadership went into hiding as the coalition forces completed the occupation of the country. On 1 May President George W. Bush declared an end to major combat operations: this ended the invasion period and began the period of military occupation.

You might be interested in
Which is an important difference between the freedom rides and unauthorized marches?
olga2289 [7]

Answer:

Freedom rides were testing whether an existing law would be upheld, while unauthorized marches were intentionally breaking an unjust law.

Hope this helps!

6 0
2 years ago
I NEED THIS ASAP!!!! I WILL MARK YOU AS THE TOP ANSWER IF RIGHT
tigry1 [53]
The Information Revolution is a phrase we use to refer to the dramatic changes taking place during the last half of the 20th century in which service jobs (ranging from high technology, highly skilled professions to low-skill jobs like short-order cook) are more common than jobs in manufacturing or agriculture. The product of skilled professionals is the information or knowledge they provide.

The information revolution began with the invention of the integrated circuit or computer chip. Those chips have revolutionized our lives, running our appliances, providing calculators, computers, and other electronic devices to control our world.

It is still early enough that no one knows precisely what all of the implications of the information revolution will be for social life. But clearly changes such as the information superhighway permitting people to communicate using computers all around the globe, fax machines, satellite dishes, and cellular phones are changing how families spend their time, the kind of work we do, and many other aspects of our lives. 
Hope this helps ^^
<span> </span>
5 0
3 years ago
What changes took place in a country that was fighting a 'Total War?
Gwar [14]

Answer:

Almost the whole of Europe and its colonial empires mobilized to wage World War I, directing almost all aspects of life including industry, finance, labor, and food production toward military purposes.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following explains a similarity among reactions to the characteristics of immigration in the late 1800s described i
Nastasia [14]

The option that explains a similarity among reactions to the characteristics of immigration in the late 1800s  is that;

  • Nativists were said to have advocated that the government should lower  the power of immigrant voters in elections.

<h3>What were some of the reactions to the new immigration?</h3>

There were a lot of reactions to the New Immigration. here, big businesses were said to be taking control of the immigrants because  the government was not doing it.

Her also, immigrants were said to have been exploited for their political votes. The new immigrants were said to be different due to the fact that they originate from southern and eastern Europe.

Learn more about immigration from

brainly.com/question/24475673

8 0
2 years ago
Who is the 20th president
slamgirl [31]

Answer:

James A Garfield

Explanation:

what a dude

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was the first european to reach north america since the viking expeditions
    5·1 answer
  • What short and long term goals might president monroe have had in mind when he formulated the monroe doctrine in 1823?
    10·1 answer
  • What was a result of the passage of the 1965 voting rights act?
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone please help on this question?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the “Great Compromise” in drafting the new constitution?
    13·2 answers
  • How does this represent nationalism
    14·1 answer
  • Bilang isang mag-aaral, ano ang kahalagahan ng pagkakaroon ng tamang pag-aaloka sa iyong mga pangangailangan sa araw-araw?
    14·1 answer
  • What Nazi policy targeted people who had disabilities?
    13·2 answers
  • What are the major trends in the time period 1450 to 1750?
    11·1 answer
  • The idea that all citizens have certain freedoms is known as
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!