1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lys-0071 [83]
3 years ago
6

Why you do think it is important to have safety procedures in the workplace?

Law
2 answers:
olya-2409 [2.1K]3 years ago
7 0
To be safe and free from danger
garri49 [273]3 years ago
4 0
One reason would be to protect the workers. If the workers were in a dangerous workspace their loves could be at danger. If anything were to happen to those workers the company would be responsible. Another reason is if the workers got hurt it would the company’s fault. If a worker got hurt on the job they would be responsible for the injury which could cause bad reviews and the company may he shut down.
You might be interested in
Who ever is the first to answer will be brainlist<br>​
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

sweet

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following are exceptions to the "Fruit of the
EastWind [94]

Answer:

C.

Explanation: I took the test and once I put C, and submitted it. I got it right

6 0
2 years ago
An acquisition with property law in nepal? brief .​
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

what are you asking

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Should police officers who use deadly force be provided the same due process as any other citizen?
icang [17]

Answer: depends on the case... but most like you no

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A defendant is on trial for a murder that occurred during a robbery at the victim's home. a witness helped the police artist com
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

No, as hearsay not within any exception.

Explanation:

(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an example of a foreign policy issue?
    12·1 answer
  • The Magna Carta was presented to King John in 1215 because people
    14·2 answers
  • Question 29 (3 points)
    7·1 answer
  • What effect did Ruth Bader Ginsburg have on the Virginia Military Institute?
    8·1 answer
  • PORQUE SE LE CONSIDERA RENTABILIDAD A LA BASE IMPONIBLE
    8·1 answer
  • One kind of evidence in law
    12·1 answer
  • Hòa giải vụ án tranh chấp thừa kế theo pháp luật tố tụng dân sự Việt Nam
    5·1 answer
  • Para obtener dicha calidad es necesario tener un modo honesto de vivir.
    7·1 answer
  • Assume this is a home where no criminal activity is taking place. What might explain the loss of heat in certain areas of the ho
    14·1 answer
  • The case of Max v. National Credit Co. is heard in a trial court. The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co. v. Pecan Corp. is heard in a
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!