Answer:
I think he can not . I believe that it has nothing to do that if for example Bailey had a car insurance with Progressive, which means it is supposed to provide additional insurance when they are injured by someone who does not have adequate insurance to cover the full damages. Bailey was negligent In the car accident. Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings.
Explanation:
Answer:obama administration is calledd
Explanation:
Answer:
cil transmitir información sobre los derechos humanos que modificar actitudes y conductas. Es afectar los corazones, los estilos de vida, las convicciones. Educar en derechos humanos no puede reducirse al orden intelectual, pertenece al reino de los sentimientos, de las pasiones, porque supone trascender la palabra y pasar a la acción.
Explanation:
Answer:
terry v. ohio
Explanation:
Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
