Answer:
The capacity of the lathe department is 3200 parts/week. The workers capacity is the bottleneck.
Explanation:
In this case we have to compare the machine capacity and the worker capacity, and detecting shich one is limitating the capacity of the department.
Machine capacity
The time it takes for a machine to process a batch is
In 40-hour week, every machine can process 2 batches/week.
With 20 machines, the capacity of the department is 2*20=40 batch/week (4000 pcs/week).
Workers capacity
With 40-hour week and 5-hours setup, every worker can make (40/5)=8 setups a week.
If the department has 4 workers, the amount of setups that can be done is 4*8=32 setups/week. That means that only 32 batches can be processed per week (3200 pcs/week).
The workers resource is the limitating capacity, and therefore the capacity of the lathe department.
In order to properly tackle this problem, we must understand the relationship between the nominal annual rate and real (effective) annual rate.
To do this:
-First you take the nominal rate, divide by the number of times it's compounded (converted) per year.
-Then, add one to that number, and raise that number to the power of how many times you compound per year.
Here is the method in practice:
First 3 Years:
Nominal rate= 2% ÷ 12 times/yr = 0.001667
Effective rate = 1.001667 ^12 = 1.020184
Next 2 Years (Discounting)
3% ÷ 2/yr = .015
1.015 ^ 2 = 1.061364
Next 4 years (Interest)
.042 ÷ .5 (once every 2 years) = .084
1.084 ^ (1/2) = 1.041153
The last 3 years are already expressed as an effective rate, so we don't need to convert them. The annual rate is:
1.058
I kept the 1 in the numbers (1.058 instead of 5.8% for example) so that it's easier to find the final number
Take every relevant number and raise it to the power of the number of years it's compounded for. For discounting, raise it to a negative power.
First 3 years: 1.020184 ^ 3 = 1.061784
Next 2 years: 1.030225 ^ -2 = .942184
Next 4 years: 1.041163 ^ 4 = 1.175056
Last 3 years: 1.058 ^ -3 = .84439
Multiply these numbers (include all decimals when you do this calculation)
1.062 * .942 * 1.175 * .844 = .992598
This is our final multiplier to find the effect on our principal:
.992598 * 2,480 = 2461.64
Answer is 2461.64
The value of the holdings of Megahurtz International Car Rentals at year end is CA$176,923.08
The value of the holdings if the real went up against the dollar is $266, 667. 67.
<h3>How to find the value of the holdings?</h3>
The exchange rate before the real declined was:
= 270,000 / 200, 000
= 1.35 real per dollar
The new exchange rate after the Real declined was:
= 1.35 x 1.3
= 1.755 Real per dollar
The value of the holdings at year end in Real will therefore be:
= 270, 000 x 1.15
= 310, 500 Real
In Canadian dollar this is:
= 310, 500 / 1.755
= CA$176,923.08
The new exchange rate as a result of the Real increasing in value is:
= 1.35 x (1 - 16% increase in value)
= 1.134 Real per dollar
The value of the holdings at year end would therefore be:
= 270,000 x (1 + 12% earning)
= 302, 400 Reals
In Canadian Dollar this is:
= 302, 400 / 1.134
= CA$266, 666. 67
Find out more on the value of holdings at brainly.com/question/15352363
#SPJ1
Answer:
telecommunications network connecting dealers.
Explanation:
Over the counter market or OTC market is referred to that market in which members trade the currencies, stock among the parties without the broker. In this, trade has done electronically without meeting personally i.e. Dealer and broker connect via mobiles phones
This market is held through a network of dealers instead of a central broker. One example of over the counter market is the London stock exchange.
Answer:
The Kano model is a theory for product development and customer satisfaction developed in the 1980s by Professor Noriaki Kano, which classifies customer preferences into five categories. Hope it helps
Explanation:
