Parents may claim a $2,000 child tax credit for a dependent child who is 22 years of age at the end of the year if the child is a full-time student. The Child Tax Credit is a refundable tax benefit claimed by filing Form 1040 claim a tax credit of $2,000 per qualifying dependent child under age 17
<h3>What is
Child Tax Credit?</h3>
Different nations offer parents with dependent children a tax advantage known as the child tax credit (CTC). The credit is frequently correlated with the number of dependent children a taxpayer has, as well as occasionally with their income. For instance, only families in the United States who earn less than $400,000 year are eligible to get the entire CTC. Similar to the United States, only families earning less than £42,000 a year are eligible for the tax credit in the United Kingdom.
The federal child tax credit (CTC) in the United States is a tax credit that is only partially refundable for parents of dependent children. Subject to an earned income level and phase-in, it offers $2,000 in tax relief per eligible kid (with up to $1,400 of that amount being refundable).
To learn more about Child Tax Credit from the given link:
brainly.com/question/17395659
#SPJ4
A market
share objective is the reason they encountered losses. Market share often pursues by companies when industry sales are relatively
flat or declining. Although increased market share is a primary goal of some
firms, others see it as a means to other ends: increasing sales and profits.
The principle of open opportunity in the marketplace means that anyone who wants to put up a business is welcome to do so. However, the success of his business rests entirely on how well it is received in the market.
Guaranteeing success to everyone in the marketplace is impossible. Competition is always present. Demand and supply can be affected by factors beyond human control.
<span>This will lead to a flattening of the overall organization. This will allow the management to be closer to the end consumer, giving a better overall customer service reputation as well as a cost savings in not having to have as many levels of bureaucracy to go through on the part of the consumer.</span>
Answer:
The right approach is Option a (supply of the good).
Explanation:
- Supply would increase substantially of some more production. Increasing the income of established businesses wouldn’t rise, as there has been increasing competitiveness.
- This similar value of the product is likely to decline due to further fulfillment as well as the same requirement. Marginal costs would never be compromised.
Anyone else alternatives possible does not apply to the situation throughout the question. That's the right thing above.
