Answer: First option is correct.
Explanation:
Since measurements, observations, and data can be displayed on a graph, whereas predictions can not be displayed on a graph.
When we have the collected data, we can display with the help of graph.
When we have observations, we can display it too.
When we have measurements, we can also display it.
All those things which are in numerical terms, we can display it on the graph.
But prediction is just an assumptions that an individual is supposing to occur, so it may be not in numerical terms.
Hence, First option is correct.
Since you say ‘which’ , in order to answer you, we would need the options you are given, but my answer would be
1. Not reusable
2. Might use up someday
3. Burning it will produce carbon dioxide and worsen global warming
Hope these can help :)
Answer:
Please find the punnet square to this question as an attachment
F1 generation:
genotype = BW
Phenotype = Erminette offsprings
F2 generation:
genotype = BB (1): BW(2): WW(1)
Phenotype = 1 Black, 2 Erminette, 1White
Explanation:
This question involves a gene coding for feather color in chickens. The allele for black feathers (B) is codominant with the allele for white feathers (W) to form an erminette chicken (black and white speckles).
According to this question, a cross between a chick with black (BB) feathers and chicken with white (WW) feathers will result in an all erminette chicken (BW) in the F1 generation (see attached image)
Also, in the F2 generation got by self-crossing the Erminette genotype in the F1 generation (BW), the following genotypic and phenotypic ratios are observed:
Genotypic ratio = BB (1): BW(2): WW(1)
Phenotypic ratio = 1 Black, 2 Erminette, 1White