The answer below (I need 20 characters to respond so just ignore the words between the parenthesis on this response)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis is written as follows
For the null hypothesis,
µd ≤ 10
For the alternative hypothesis,
µ > 10
This is a right tailed test
Since no population standard deviation is given, the distribution is a student's t.
Since n = 97
Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 97 - 1 = 96
t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)
Where
x = sample mean = 8.9
µ = population mean = 10
s = samples standard deviation = 3.6
t = (8.9 - 10)/(3.6/√97) = - 3
We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes
p = 0.00172
Since alpha, 0.01 > than the p value, 0.00172, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 1% level of significance, there is enough evidence that the data do not support the vendor’s claim.
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
Only 'improper' fractions would have this result....that is fractions with numerator > denominator
Answer:
Third graph from the top
Step-by-step explanation:
Formula for g(x) is g(x) = 3 · x∧2
When we replace x=5 in the formula we get:
g(5) = 3 · 5∧2 = 3 · 25 = 75
God with you!!!
Between 10 and 11, all the others would be to much or to little