I believe the answer is:
1) Freedom for consumers and producers
2) Competition between businesses
3) distribution by price
4) motivated by self-interest
In a free market economy, Private sectors have larger influence in determining the outcome of the economy compared to the Government.
This mean that both consumers and producers have the freedom to produce and consume whatever they want, government would not be interfering with business competition, and the production that happen would be motivated by desire to obtain profit.
Answer:
i will knock u quit playin with me
Explanation:
s t u p i d a $ $
Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
Answer:Asia/ China
Explanation:
Centralized givernment and a corps of bureaucrats who could execute the wishes of that government and it lasted until 1911 CE
